On a separate note, I'm obviously missing something major - I really do not understand why or how Ed Corrie can be gutted by losing the match to Marchenko. Not to this extent.
I saw the match - it was brilliant, very close, well played by both but, honestly, overall Marchneko deserved to win (just). He lost the second set TB to a dubious line call in Ed's favour, lost his cool,, got his act back together again, regrouped for the third, Ed played extremely well, had one poor service game just when he'd broken back at 5-5 (form recollection) but, hey, there was nothing in it - it most certainly wasn't a match that 'got away' or that he'd got won and then gifted (unlike James Ward, say, in the first round of Queens - now THAT'S the sort of match that takes a lot of getting over).
NB I was at Paddington today (the tour event) and near a group of lads talking about their various matches over the summer - quite a bit of talk about Ed (one of them had played him, others knew friends who had) and how he was winnable, solid on important points, but perfectly winnable. Personally, I think that might be a lot of 'talk' - it's easy to talk a good story - but the 'grapevine' obviously affects people's perception before a match . . .
I hope it was more as Korriban says, and a question of illness and a lot of different factors coming together, which will all be history pretty quickly and he can get back on track.
On a separate note, I'm obviously missing something major - I really do not understand why or how Ed Corrie can be gutted by losing the match to Marchenko. Not to this extent.
I saw the match - it was brilliant, very close, well played by both but, honestly, overall Marchneko deserved to win (just). He lost the second set TB to a dubious line call in Ed's favour, lost his cool,, got his act back together again, regrouped for the third, Ed played extremely well, had one poor service game just when he'd broken back at 5-5 (form recollection) but, hey, there was nothing in it - it most certainly wasn't a match that 'got away' or that he'd got won and then gifted (unlike James Ward, say, in the first round of Queens - now THAT'S the sort of match that takes a lot of getting over).
NB I was at Paddington today (the tour event) and near a group of lads talking about their various matches over the summer - quite a bit of talk about Ed (one of them had played him, others knew friends who had) and how he was winnable, solid on important points, but perfectly winnable. Personally, I think that might be a lot of 'talk' - it's easy to talk a good story - but the 'grapevine' obviously affects people's perception before a match . . .
I hope it was more as Korriban says, and a question of illness and a lot of different factors coming together, which will all be history pretty quickly and he can get back on track.
All I can say is that he looked mortified to have lost the match, as did his coach (older brother, David) although he did his best to hide it front of Ed. I think it was down to having played 3 really good matches on grass and having got nothing to show for it.
As for the comments of the lads at Paddington, I don't think that sounds unreasonable. Ed hardly ever blows anyone away so most guys will always feel like they are in the match. Pretty much all of the guys who play at futures level with any regularity, even if they mostly lose first round, are obviously pretty good tennis players and most have a substantial ego. As long as someone isn't blowing them off the court they think a match is winnable.
Only point about Marchenko was that it was his third straight loss in a tight match on an important stage in the space of a few weeks - the key part of his season on grass. I'm sure he was beaten fair and square, but the position he'd been in over the previous few weeks would have been frustrating.
Liam beating Dan isn't a big shock but the scoreline is so given that Dan is attending his cousin's wedding on Sunday you have to wonder whether he really wanted to be in Sheffield tomorrow.
Let's give him the benefit of the doubt - how many matches in a row has he won?! We was 22-1 in his last 23 matches after all.
-- Edited by korriban on Friday 6th of September 2013 10:41:56 AM
Apparently they met in their local club championship some years ago and Rob won.
Liam confirms what many of us thought, i.e. that Evo's recent success is in many ways more inspiring than Andy's to the other Brits because they can relate to it better.
Sadly, the 2nd set bagel in Rob's semi-final win is explained by Bloomers injuring himself yet again - leg this time.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Liam beating Dan isn't a big shock but the scoreline is so given that Dan is attending his cousin's wedding on Sunday you have to wonder whether he really wanted to be in Sheffield tomorrow.