Mr Evans is clearly a media story in the US: US media/public seems to drive most USO decisions, and that Evans/Robredo has knocked not only the Ferrer match off of Armstrong but also Sock/Tipsarevic and Raonic/Lopez (which one would have thought will be a cracking match) is rather telling. Don't think it's just the need to have next-round opponents playing at roughly the same time (which presumably is the reason for the lateness of the match, given that Federer is at night) either.
-- Edited by Spectator on Saturday 31st of August 2013 02:23:41 AM
Oh shut up, Neil, of course they don't care. And in today's multimedia world I think we might just cope without your thoughts in the next morning's paper.
I had been thinking 4th on Armstrong was just great for Evo, and it is !
Harman comes across as a right pompous individual. Saw a reply of his on twitter to someone enquiring about his print silence on Dan Evans' two challenger finals and he smugly replied that it was the equivalent of writing about non-league football. No Neil, it's the British number two posting significant results and you're a tennis correspondent for a major UK newspaper, I'm sure there's a few sentences of space you can fill between talking about Maria Sharapova's new haircut.
Sorry, Neil, but if you think there's much reason for the US Open folk to give much of a toss about British newspapers compared to all other considerations, you really are losing the plot. Yes, maybe you should quit anyway.
Gawd, what's happened lately to him ? He always was up his own **** a bit, but was still a decent tennis journalist, but lately I don't know..
Clearly the Federer match should have been scheduled daytime so that Evo's match could logically be also scheduled daytime so that the British newspapers wouldn't miss their deadlines with their big write-ups about Evo.