Very harsh scoreline and very harsh scheduling so although a tad disappointing, not back to the drawing board stuff.
Petra gave a D grade performance in Australia, today was obviously much better, very few double faults.
Laura did alot of interviews after yesterday's win and also hit on court with a couple of children, good PR and a lovely thing to do, but given the tight scheduling, possibly hurt her today. Petra sounded pretty bullish as well pre tournament. Laura has only beaten top players when they have underperformed and is ranked where she is a for a reason.
Still though only 13 wins for Laura this year but lots of points gained, will be interesting to see how she does in the doubles later on.
Certainly that scoreline was not reflective of the match - Laura deserved to lose in straight sets but 6-1 6-2 sounds like a thrashing when in reality she lost a lot of games where she had games point. Looks like Kvitova served really well too.
With two very up and down players it's hard to tell beyond serve stats if Laura was tired after yesterday (possible given some pretty terrible scheduling) or if Kvitova player really well (she is 7 in the world for a reason and even Laura is going to have games against top 10 players where she falls well short).
Overall a par tournament for Laura, beating a player she should beat and losing to one much higher ranked. Was much closer to being worse though and not at all close to being any better.
Indeed. She unfortunately just didn't pull through in the big moments.
It seems from following Laura that she doesn't do well on the important points...
But then I checked the stats on the WTA site and in fact Laura has converted on 47.2% of break points and saved 57.9%. Conclusion, Laura does OK on the 'clutch' points, but it's easier to remember the points that got away.
It does feel that way, indeed. And I'm actually not surprised by those statistics, because as you say, we remember the ones that got away. My statement wasn't intended to look sweeping so I apologise if it did, I was strictly referring to today's match.
It does feel that way, indeed. And I'm actually not surprised by those statistics, because as you say, we remember the ones that got away. My statement wasn't intended to look sweeping so I apologise if it did, I was strictly referring to today's match.
That's OK, I didn't think you did. I was just asking the wider question myself, then using some stats to answer it.
I think the SC mind just refuses to recognise some terminology originating from our American friends LOL ( no matter how reasonable it might at times actually be )