Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 31 - ITF ($100K) - Vancouver, Canada - Hard


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4222
Date:
RE: Week 31 - ITF ($100K) - Vancouver, Canada - Hard


BPs for Naomi and she breaks for *6-5

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5568
Date:

All with a decent chance now to qualify - well done and hopefully all three will get through to join our other representatives in the main draw.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

Thanks Sally
Sally wrote:

Clean sweep for the girls in QR2!

 QR2: WEBLEY-SMITH, Emily (GBR) 8 421 beat BLAJKEVITCH, Khristina (CAN) UNR 6-1 6-2 

QR2: (q5) Jade Windley WR 348 beat Krista Hardebeck (USA) WR 471 (CH=279 Sep 2012) 5-7 6-2 6-2

QR2: (q1) Naomi Broady WR 305 beat Nicole Rottmann (AUT) WR 433 (CH=307 Jul 2012) 6-4 4-6 7-5

And the QR3 match-ups: 

QR3: (8) Emily Webley-Smith WR 421 v Sherazad Benamar FRA WR 493

QR3: (5) Jade Windley WR 348 v (WC) Robin Anderson USA WR 640

QR3: (1) Naomi Broady WR 305 v (7) Miki Miyamura JPN WR 369

 


Another confidence boosting win for Emily She has played Benamar twice before, each of them winning one match in straight sets, but both matches were back in 2007. Perhaps more to the point, Benamar upset Naomi in Granby a couple of weeks ago, so it won't be easy.

A very convincing last two sets from Jade, by the looks of it - she has now won the last five times she has recovered from a set down to level the match at 1 set all. Having beaten one under-ranked college player in Hardebeck (at Stanford), she will play another in Anderson, who is at UCLA and beat the 2nd seed today.

It looks like Naomi made a bit of a meal of her match (again) and even the odds suggested she was favourite to lose the 3rd set when it got there ... but that also makes it all the more impressive that she pulled through.  Not much to add about Miyamura - a quick skim through her results makes it look like her ranking tells a true story.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

When was the last time 6 girls made a 100k outside the UK?

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Date:

The biggest problem with any of the girls qualifying is that the open spots in the MD are, one against the 4th seed Julia Glushko and another 2 against either Sam or Tara cry



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

AliBlahBlah wrote:

All with a decent chance now to qualify - well done and hopefully all three will get through to join our other representatives in the main draw.


That would (in the absence of lucky loser places) imply at least one all-GB match in R1.

Btw when I thanked Sally, I meant to add the following, though please ignore what follows, Sally, if what I suggest would be a lot more hassle or or if this suggestion gets shouted down before you see it!

When it becomes clear that you are the only person posting updates on the match, I wonder if it would be better to do something like one or two posts per set and keep editing them (I know someone on this forum does it like that, can't remember who at the moment) - the advantages from the reader's point of view are that the match all ends up on 1 or 2 pages, making it easier to take in what happened later on. Also, it would make any other information that people post during the match (like next opponent details) easier to find later - though I realise that you made the effort to collate all the results and give us the FQR draw at the end in this case.

Obviously, as soon as it becomes clear that other people are getting involved, the advantages of doing a new post each time start to outweigh the disadvantages, but when that isn't happening ... well, it's just a thought from this reader's point of view.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:

When was the last time 6 girls made a 100k outside the UK?


I'll try to find out ... but only if it gets close to happening tomorrow! (and even then, I probably won't dare say anything unless/until it does! wink)



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Date:

steven wrote:
AliBlahBlah wrote:

All with a decent chance now to qualify - well done and hopefully all three will get through to join our other representatives in the main draw.


That would (in the absence of lucky loser places) imply at least one all-GB match in R1.

Btw when I thanked Sally, I meant to add the following, though please ignore what follows, Sally, if what I suggest would be a lot more hassle or or if this suggestion gets shouted down before you see it!

When it becomes clear that you are the only person posting updates on the match, I wonder if it would be better to do something like one or two posts per set and keep editing them (I know someone on this forum does it like that, can't remember who at the moment) - the advantages from the reader's point of view are that the match all ends up on 1 or 2 pages, making it easier to take in what happened later on. Also, it would make any other information that people post during the match (like next opponent details) easier to find later - though I realise that you made the effort to collate all the results and give us the FQR draw at the end in this case.

Obviously, as soon as it becomes clear that other people are getting involved, the advantages of doing a new post each time start to outweigh the disadvantages, but when that isn't happening ... well, it's just a thought from this reader's point of view.


 I concur with this suggestion as I have trouble scrolling through pages of what for me are too many posts that I don't read as I am following the matches on LS anyway.



__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

Wow that's a tough draw for JoKo, Jo loves playing the orthodox flat hitting asian players, but unfortunately her opponent doesn't play in that style. Saw quite a bit of their match at Eastbourne and although competitive Hsieh Su-Wei just had too much in her locker. Hopefully Jo can close the gap this time, but ultimately it will probably depend on which Hsieh Su-Wei turns up.

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 641
Date:


FQ : Johanna KONTA (GBR)/Tara MOORE (GBR) [1] beat Rosie JOHANSON (CAN)/ Alexis PROKOPUIK (CAN) (WC) 6-1 6-4

L16 : Johanna KONTA (GBR)/Tara MOORE (GBR) (Q) v Nicole ROTTMANN (AUT)/ Lenka WIENEROVA (SVK)

 

L16 : Naomi BROADY (GBR)/ Emily WEBLEY-SMITH (GBR) v Venise CHAN (HKG) / Keren SHLOMO (ISR) (Q)

 



 



-- Edited by WD40 on Tuesday 30th of July 2013 01:53:18 PM



-- Edited by WD40 on Wednesday 31st of July 2013 02:25:44 AM

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4222
Date:

Jade just started. RA held for 1-0*

If anyone wants my updates, they'll be more sporadic than usual but I'll try to update every 15 minutes or so



-- Edited by Sally on Tuesday 30th of July 2013 05:19:45 PM

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4222
Date:

steven wrote:
AliBlahBlah wrote:

All with a decent chance now to qualify - well done and hopefully all three will get through to join our other representatives in the main draw.


That would (in the absence of lucky loser places) imply at least one all-GB match in R1.

Btw when I thanked Sally, I meant to add the following, though please ignore what follows, Sally, if what I suggest would be a lot more hassle or or if this suggestion gets shouted down before you see it!

When it becomes clear that you are the only person posting updates on the match, I wonder if it would be better to do something like one or two posts per set and keep editing them (I know someone on this forum does it like that, can't remember who at the moment) - the advantages from the reader's point of view are that the match all ends up on 1 or 2 pages, making it easier to take in what happened later on. Also, it would make any other information that people post during the match (like next opponent details) easier to find later - though I realise that you made the effort to collate all the results and give us the FQR draw at the end in this case.

Obviously, as soon as it becomes clear that other people are getting involved, the advantages of doing a new post each time start to outweigh the disadvantages, but when that isn't happening ... well, it's just a thought from this reader's point of view.


 Good suggestion and I will start doing that going forwards!



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4222
Date:

Jade takes the first set 6-2

Emily 5-5* - Broken while serving for the set

Naomi loses the first set 6-4

 



-- Edited by Sally on Tuesday 30th of July 2013 06:02:32 PM

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4222
Date:

Jade 6-4

Naomi 6-2 in the third (full result edited in later post)

 

Emily 3-1 

 



-- Edited by Sally on Tuesday 30th of July 2013 07:31:00 PM

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4222
Date:

Emily, Jade & Naomi are all up first on various courts.

__________________
«First  <  16 7 8 9 1029  >  Last»  | Page of 29  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard