Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 26/27 - Wimbledon women's main draw - grass


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55530
Date:
Week 26/27 - Wimbledon women's main draw - grass


Didn't realise that Tara had spent 6 years with Nick - thanks Helen40 - that might explain a couple of things . . .

 

Tara a break up in the second but still very close . . .



-- Edited by Coup Droit on Tuesday 25th of June 2013 05:05:33 PM



-- Edited by Coup Droit on Tuesday 25th of June 2013 05:06:11 PM

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2443
Date:

Paul. I'm on your side really! smile

Journalists like a story. The story isn't the individual loss of a Sam Murray or an Elena Baltacha. I'd like to think they get no joy out of personal insults (actually, they probably do).

The story is the fact that for year after year after year we never have more than 1 or 2 men's and 1 or 2 women's players who line up for the Grand Slams (as especially Wimbledon) by right. Despite the fact that we are the proud country behind the greatest tennis tournament of them all, with perhaps the richest governing body in the sport.

As a young athlete, therefore, you could hardly argue that young British tennis players are somehow disadvantaged compared to, say, the Serbs or the Croats or the Belgians.........limited populations, limited budgets, no Grand Slams or major tournaments.

So the journalists find it extraordinary that every year we need to resort to WCs not for our 10th or 15th ranked players, but our 2nd or 3rd ranked players. The fact that these WC players then go on to lose en masse (yes I know they are invariably lower ranked, but with local support & more grass court practice they ought to be able to fight slightly above their pay grade. Furthermore, as we know in sport (just ask Rafa and Stan) it is exceptionally unusual for, say, 7 favourites out of 7 to win their matches, so statistically en masse losses shouldn't happen.

I think what I am trying to say (badly, I know) is that the journos are having a pop at the somewhat farcical general situation in GB elite tennis versus where we ought to be, rather than having a personal pop at the Sam Murray's and Elena's.......they are simply using them as examples of a bigger issue.

Enough already!



__________________


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

Tara is doing so well in this match. Love the variation on the backhand; some super slices and solid double-handers. Not so sure of the wisdom of running around her backhand in order to hit a forehand. So naturally she runs around it and hits a screaming winner crosscourt.

 

 



-- Edited by kundalini on Tuesday 25th of June 2013 06:08:29 PM

__________________


Specialist Reporter + Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

Crowd are really into this match. Tara saves mp with an unreturned first serve. 5-5

 Umpire over-rules when it looks like Tara has broken. The close calls certainly haven't gone Tara's way in this match.



-- Edited by kundalini on Tuesday 25th of June 2013 06:24:01 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 55530
Date:

Three games. Three breaks. Madison not serving so well. Heather looking a little more settled.

The second set is looking better . . . .

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

A lot of comments have been made about the lack of vocal support of some of the Brits yesterday. Sam Murray, Ward in the beginning and Keothavong and it is probably as Korriban says probably because they are losing to players that Wimbledon goers haven't heard of assuming they should beat them when in fact they are unlikely to. A bit more support yesterday might have given them an extra few points. The press and crowd are expecting too much from our limited pool of players and all that is happening is more pressure is being applied.

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 4586
Date:

Heather starting to settle now talking of pressure. Even when heather is playing below her best she can dig out a result which probably makes her different from our other top 6 ladies.

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Heather has started playing a bit more aggressively, which she often does when behind, and often to good effect. Keys is up and down as you would expect from an 18 year old but certainly showing how talented she is.

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Jaggy1876 wrote:

A lot of comments have been made about the lack of vocal support of some of the Brits yesterday. Sam Murray, Ward in the beginning and Keothavong and it is probably as Korriban says probably because they are losing to players that Wimbledon goers haven't heard of assuming they should beat them when in fact they are unlikely to. A bit more support yesterday might have given them an extra few points. The press and crowd are expecting too much from our limited pool of players and all that is happening is more pressure is being applied.


 I was a bit surprised there wasn't more vocal support for Bally and Kyle yesterday when I was watching on court 3, but to be fair there was plenty of support when Bally pulled the first set back to 5-4. It justneeds a competitive match to get the crowd going - unfortunately you will never get the Olympics atmosphere at Wimbledon (for Bally and for hev today being first on at 11:30 doesn't help as the court is half empty)



__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Heather plays her best game of the match to hold for 5-5 but Keys gets the big serving going again and Heather will serve at *5-6

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

That last game probably sums up how it's gone for the British girls so far - two ridiculous net chords at 0-15 and 0-40.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10691
Date:

Keys is good. Very good.

Hev just not good enough on the day to cope with the power, and Madison was way more consistent that I expected, thought she'd have very ragged periods but not at all.

Shame, it's not like Hev played badly at all.

In relation to the Bally/Kyle crowd, they were on court 3, which is usually half empty cos it's ticketed. They need to get rid of that system and leave it fully open to the public. It looked less than half full when Bally started yesterday.

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 336
Date:

''In relation to the Bally/Kyle crowd, they were on court 3, which is usually half empty cos it's ticketed. They need to get rid of that system and leave it fully open to the public. It looked less than half full when Bally started yesterday. ''

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't think you should get rid of a system just because it did not produce the result you were hoping for or try and use lack of crowd support as an excuse as to why they lost. As wildcards, they should be grateful they are in the tournament at all.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10691
Date:

Court 3 (and to a lesser extent court 2) usually have massive gaps in the crowd irrespective who is playing - nothing to do with trying to find an excuse for the Brits.

If all of the outside courts were non-ticketed they would all be full.

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

PaulM wrote:

Court 3 (and to a lesser extent court 2) usually have massive gaps in the crowd irrespective who is playing - nothing to do with trying to find an excuse for the Brits.

If all of the outside courts were non-ticketed they would all be full.


 It's difficult because the 11:30 start time is going to lead to the court being quite empty at the start but the BBC want to show a British match in that window before Centre court starts. The other reason is that often on Court 3 the matches aren't obviously more attractive than other matches in the ground. A couple of years ago I had a court 3 seat that largely remained empty because there were more interesting matches on the outside courts (maybe this shouldn't be allowed but if it is and I've paid my money I'll watch whatever match I feel like).

In their latest renovation plans Wimbledon stated that they would prefer more unticketed courts, but that this requires queueing space which doesn't currently exist.



__________________
«First  <  110 11 12 13 1432  >  Last»  | Page of 32  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard