Lots to like about that - and about the ability to keep his head when he could have lost the match on serve. Even if it winds up 2,2 and 4, that's a perfectly respectable scoreline for a first-time WC 18-year-old against a very large, very powerful seeded player. Good experience.
The court looked quicker than Eastbourne, Kyle's second serve was a problem and he was struggling against the big serves on ground shots when the Pole upped the pace.
Overall, a creditable performance from Kyle. Thought he looked a bit overawed in the early stages but seemed to be a change in approach mid 2nd set. For me, at 3-0 down in the 2nd, he decided to go more agressive and not without some success. 6-2 6-2 6-4 is not the worst result in the world and at one point, I feared a real drubbing. Glad that didn't happen.
Realistically the difference in quality and weight of shot was evident throughout and Janowicz was always the better player, but as Kyle is his own biggest critic, I know he will be unhappy with the UE count on his own ground strokes. I think we can put that down to the occasion and his agressive intent.
All-in-all, great experience to put "in the bank" and he will come back stronger and wiser next time.
Lots to like about that - and about the ability to keep his head when he could have lost the match on serve. Even if it winds up 2,2 and 4, that's a perfectly respectable scoreline for a first-time WC 18-year-old against a very large, very powerful seeded player. Good experience.
I agree. I watched the first and third sets. Perfectly decent score. Decent showing. No one could have expected much more. Jerzy simply had a weight of shot that rocked Kyle backwards and a trajectory (due to his height) that meant that Kyle had a lot of trouble judging the ball.
Kyle played pretty well, he'll be cross about certain things, but he was looking more and more comfortable.
After a nice start Kyle was a little overwhelmed by the Janowicz's power and all round quality which was a completely different proposition to anything he faced at Queen's or Eastbourne and it took him till early in the third set to even start to come to terms with it. This was always going to be an extremely difficult match and while he will no doubt have a few regrets and I am sure that he will take a lot of positives from the experience. It was important that he was able to play a good third set as it will remove any embarrassment factor that might have unfairly been associated with the result. Kyle will have better days at Wimbledon in years to come.
I think Kyle will be disappointed, given his high standards, but the way the Pole played there was only going to be one outcome: a straight sets loss. No disgrace given the exceptional power and skill that was on display on the other side of the net.....bank the experience, and a useful reality check too.
Kyle Edmund on his straight-sets defeat to Jerzy Janowicz: "It was a tough experience. It was very tough out there to get much rhythm, sort of ease into the tournament. He's such a big player, hits the ball really hard, and if you're not on it 100%, it's very tough. I still played okay, I thought. But at that level, I think I need to play better to win.
Sort of what everybody said on this forum. . . . plenty of time, Kyle . . .