For the record (the doubles qualies don't seem to have been recorded elsewhere):
QR1: (q1) Dustin Brown & Rameez Junaid (GER/AUS) WR 194 defeated Ed Corrie & Neal Skupski WR 852 by 6-7(2) 6-3 6-3 QR1: (q7) Steve Johnson & Andreas Siljeström (USA/SWE) WR 264 defeated Lewis Burton & Dan Evans WR 894 by 7-6(7) 4-6 11-9 QR1: Andreas Haider-Maurer & Jiri Vesely (AUT/CZE) UNR defeated (q6) Brydan Klein & Dane Propoggia (AUS) WR 232 by 7-6(2) 6-2
Given the huge disparity in rankings, it's to Ed's & Neal's & Lewis' & Dan's credit that they appear to have made them competitive encounters.
-- Edited by Stircrazy on Thursday 20th of June 2013 08:11:01 PM
Starting this now because Colin & Jonny have been seeded ninth & TCH & Dom 16th.
Interestingly (I've been away for a few days & only just noticed), while Jamie Baker & Kyle Edmund & the Doc & Sean T ( ) have been awarded WCs, as we knew last week, with a third going to the "Aussie Scrapper", Lleyton Hewitt, & Mark Knowles, the web site says that the other four were not used & will go to the next DAs. Couldn't the buggers at least have seen their way to giving the Skupskis one of those remaining four?
They couldn't because Ken is already in with Malisse. Would have had to go to Neal and Ed Corrie ... which would have been a reach (though I would have been pleased).
They couldn't because Ken is already in with Malisse. Would have had to go to Neal and Ed Corrie ... which would have been a reach (though I would have been pleased).
Ah, fair enough then. I don't think I'd registered that fact (assuming it's been mentioned somewhere on here). Thanks for putting me right, Spectator. At least he has a half-way decent partner for the tournament. I, too, would have been pleased to see Neal S & Ed Corrie awarded a wild card, but I agree with you that that would've been pushing it a bit.
They are all recorded individually in the "Wimbledon Men's Qualifying" thread, but are a bit lost in there! .....and it was a proper set 11-9 games were played.
They are all recorded individually in the "Wimbledon Men's Qualifying" thread, but are a bit lost in there! .....and it was a proper set 11-9 games were played.
OK, understood. Thanks for pointing that out. Having been away for a few days, starved of Internet access ( ) & thus reliant on the Beeb's "Teletext", in which there are glaring gaps in the tennis info provided as far as I'm concerned, i.e. no doubles results of any kind provided unless they're from a Grand Slam tournament... ), I had no idea (couldn't imagine doubles results being recorded on what was essentially a singles qualies thread) that anybody had bothered & no time to check back more than 2-3 pages. Have edited my original post accordingly.
R1: David Marrero & Andreas Seppi (ESP/ITA) WR 96 vs (WC) Jamie Baker & Kyle Edmund UNR R1: Roberto Bautista & Daniel Gimeno (ESP/ESP) WR =58 (in the Race) vs (16) Treat Huey (PHI) & Dominic Inglot WR 21 (Race) R1: (9) Colin Fleming & Jonny Marray WR 33 (Race) vs Martin Klizan & Igor Zelenay (SVK/SVK) WR 240 R1: Xavier Malisse (BEL) & Ken Skupski WR 138 vs Evgeny Donskoy & Andrey Kuznetsov (RUS/RUS) WR 438 R1: (WC) David Rice & Sean Thornley WR 420 vs Marinko Matosevic & Frank Moser (AUS/GER) WR 235 R1: Jamie Delgado & Matt Ebden (AUS) WR 207 vs (WC) Lleyton Hewitt & Mark Knowles (AUS/BAH) UNR (technically, as Knowles no long apparently has a doubles ranking, but 82nd in the Race!) R1: James Blake & Jürgen Melzer (USA/AUT) WR 218 vs Jamie Murray & John Peers (AUS) WR 24 (Race)
-- Edited by Stircrazy on Friday 21st of June 2013 12:46:35 PM
This will be Jamie Delgado's 19th consecutive Wimbledon. He first played Doubles here in 1995 and has done so in every subsequent event since then with the exception of 1999. He played Singles in 1997 and then every year between 1999 and 2006.
Why did Kudla/Smyczek get a lucky loser spot here when they gave a walkover in their final qualifying match? Also Rochus got a lucky loser after retiring in his last match. Unbelievable there is not a rule against this.
I don't know what the Kudla/Smyczek situation was but Rochus was two sets up when he retired in his FQR match and I think I remember someone (Ben Rothenburg) writing that he was inconsolable after he had to retire, so assuming he has recovered in the intervening period and isn't just going to hobble onto court to claim the R1 loser money, that particular LL spot seems to have worked out well.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!