Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: LTA Funding and Participation


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 979
Date:
RE: LTA Funding and Participation


PaulM wrote:

But I suppose one argument is that GB players develop later partly due to our education system and the tendency to not drop out of school until much later than in other countries. Or at least thats the perception anyway.


I doubt whether that perception is true. I don't think that many of our top 1000 players have any A Levels, and most have devoted enormous amounts of time to tennis from the age of 10 or earlier.



__________________

"Where Ratty leads - the rest soon follow" (Professor Henry Brubaker - The Institute of Studies)



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

Thanks very much for all your figures, kundalini.

Suffice to say, certainly on an overall world level, it is twaddle that the mean breakthrough age to the ATP top 100 is 27. As I always instinctively thought, it is quite a few years earlier. As I said, it had passed me by that this had been suggested at all, anyway very interesting to see such figures.

I can and do believe that the average age of these who are in the top 100 at any time has been increasing, if maybe not as significantly as some suggest, and I still personally think that the cut off after age 19 for futures bonuses is too young. There are enough players that break through later for such rigidety to be arguably both unwise and unfair.

Generally to me in funding / bonus matters the LTA make far too much of a distinction between late teens and early twenties and I worry that a recurring effectively "you lot are not good enough, next" policy could cost GB some current decent future prospects and put others off at an early stage. A vicious circle of having fewer and fewer players younger players can relate and aspire to.

Players develop at different rates and ages !!!


__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2443
Date:

I've always felt the root cause of our British tennis problem was the sport's inability to attract each year's young "super athletes" in half decent volumes. The kids who will go on to be top athletes in whichever sport they choose. Mostly they choose football or rugby, but are typically excellent at everything they try. Andy Murray and Rafa could have played football professionally I'm sure if they had chosen to. Christian Wade was at my boys' school, and was already in the GB age group basketball team, when he was shown a rugby ball for the first time in his life.....!

Almost none of these kids ever choose tennis here. Because the clubs are often so unwelcoming to kids, because kit and courts are too expensive, because tennis coaching is generally poor here, because tennis is barely played in schools, and because the trials and junior competitions are dominated by kids of rich families or kids from tennis families, with experience and connections. I know there are many exceptions, but I still think the general thrust rings true......

Given all of this, the key actions from the LTA to create stars of the future, or 20 James Wards, will all need to be about grass roots changes, and none of these have been announced yet. I do agree that some of the funding cuts to elite tennis seem over simplistic and ill thought through, but perhaps the new regime have decided to write-off the current crop of 18 year old and above players as "not their problem"......perhaps tough love might work for 3 or 4 of them.......so the new regime wins either way. I suspect we'll see a revised elite funding approach in 3 years or so.

Having said all the above, I loved the suggestion from one poster than any LTA funding for players post juniors might be restricted to, say, a maximum of 4 years.....but the player would determine when the tap was ON and when it was OFF, no age limit. Would help post injury or post college.

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

It's a very good point, Korri.

At one of the tennis clubs I belonged to in France, we used to pair up with the local football club and when the football club had try-out sessions at the beginning of term for kids, we would give out flyers for the tennis club's 'open day', and vice versa. The city council also organised a big introduction day for all sports at the beginning of each school year and all the sports would have stands, and little games, and - in the case of tennis - a couple of courts that the different clubs in the town would share as part of a promotion package.

I also thought the four-year tap idea for funding was ingenious. The idea of an 'easy' loan, like a student loan, has also been mooted and seems a good possible idea - invest in your future, if you believe in it, and have a lifetime, on easy repayment terms, to pay it back (not from tennis earnings, but - like a student - from whatever, as long as you have the means).

But if the break-through top 100 age is 22 and the the average top 100 age is 27/28, it doesn't makes a difference to what the LTA should be doing i.e. they should be creating a structure, overall, with all the funds at their disposal, that produces a whole heap of players ranked 500-1000 or so, as well as a few in the top 100. At whatever age. You wouldn't have Man City/Chelsea if you didn't also have Luton and Bury.

NB another nice site for stat-heads, which shows the top 20 players of each age group, is:

tennisabstract.com/reports/rankingsByAge.html




__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

I still think that the fact that the cut-off for top 20 31+ players is 78 is quite extraordinary.

Nice to see that Mr Edmund and Mr Broady are both doing quite nicely relative to their peers, too.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

Yes, I love the 30+ numbers too - quite amazing, some of them.

And also agree - great to see Kyle and Liam well in the mix.

Especially Liam. And it makes me wonder what would be the case, with the new funding rules, if Liam were starting last year again this year.

i.e. he was age 19, and about WR 500. Not particularly impressive, really. Certainly not by the standards the LTA seem to be setting. Yet, with a lot of thanks (presumably) to the LTA's help last year, he had a stellar year. Life-changing maybe. Would that have been possible if the LTA had 'cut' him off as not making the grade?

Indeed, it's very much a mirror image of Luke Bambridge now - a year younger and also about WR 500. Where does he stand with the LTA? A potential top 200 at end-2015, aka Liam? Or too old, not high enough ranked, let's move on to the 14 year-olds ?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

David Sammel's new little miniguide book has come out entitled: A Parent's Guide: the transition from junior to professional tennis

It states, among other things, that one should 'beware' as the governing body is often 'not your friend'.

Guess that's Sammel's chance of being re-instated gone for the foreseeable future :::)))

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Well, better truthfulness than flattery. One would hope people might recognise that.

Indeed, was just reading the Pope's list of 15 ills he'd like to see cured in the Roman Curia - one of which was glorifying one's bosses in hopes of preferential treatment. LTA, take note!

(www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/the-pope/11308360/Pope-Francis-15-ailments-of-the-Curia.html for any who are interested - now there is someone who has come in and rewritten the rules!)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

The Pope is my hero, second to none. :)


And, just as a general comment, re funding:


James Cluskey @JamesCluskey · Dec 15

Tough for the Brits to lose some funding but what I would give for a couple of ATP events and a grand slam in my home country #LTA #tennis

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

David Sammel, as usual, and quite rightly, promoting the fact that older players are where it's at, and drawing the LTA's attention to the fact:

the average age of the top-100 men is now 28.4 yrs. old

twitter.com/DaveSammel/status/570296675601920000



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

"Federations" ha ha, like who ? :)

Very good point, well made.

I kind of worry a bit that the LTA may have Arsene Wenger Syndrome though. The more and more people unitedly, and apparently logically, point out seeming major deficiencies in their thinking, the more stubborn they may be in following their own path.

I do hope not !

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10639
Date:

The more things change, the more they stay the same.....

www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/tennis/article-2983605/LTA-stump-624-000-recruit-chief-executive-Michael-Downey-reaping-record-39m-Wimbledon.html

__________________


Social player

Status: Offline
Posts: 39
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:

Julien Hoferlein will, seemingly, be leaving the LTA in the next week.


He gives a polite, but pretty damning, recap of his 6 years here, the problems of the LTA and the problems of Dan Evans in particular.


www.rtbf.be/sport/tennis/detail_julien-hoferlin-je-m-en-vais-un-peu-decu


(There may well be English links too - happy to translate if anyone needs it).


 Having just found this site, I'm a little late to this thread, however I think that some of my personal experiences may shed a different light.

Back in 2009 I was mainly based at the NTC with a player I was 1-on-1 with (privately funded). We were on court with Julien and Dan Evans. The players were playing a tight practice set. towards the end of the set Dan got broken and lost control and started tubing balls into the Priory. What I was horrified at was that Julien did noting about it and just laughed it off.

After the practice I said to Julien that I was worried about how Dan's behaviour would affect my player as he looked up to him. His answer was even more amazing/depressing. He told me that Dan had a lot of player power and if he got tough with him and it went wrong he could lose his job.

So I agree with what Julien said in his interview but have little respect for it. I don't want to just pick on him as this sort of thing happens a lot.



__________________

ottobuchholdt.com



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

Very interesting, Otto.

And very sad.

From your story:

Julien comes out poorly (weak);

Dan Evans comes out poorly (brat-ish);

But the ones who come worst by far are the LTA - after all, the 'corporate' message comes from on high.

'Player power' ??? Dictating policy ??? In the UK ??? and Dan Evans, of all people ???

This is, of course, assuming that Julien's telling the truth but it rather ties in with other similar stories so it, unfortunately, definitely has a good ring of truth about it. Staggering . . .


__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

Basically the NTC increasingly appears to have been a bit of a mess in at least some aspects, with as CD the major responsibilty for that surely lieing with LTA chiefs.

It becomes more and more understandable why many results from these players largely based at the NTC rather underwhelmed ( although folk being all different, it seemed to suit a few ).

So much talk about hard work and standards and this stuff is going on at their flagship NTC

__________________
«First  <  18 9 10 11 12 13  >  Last»  | Page of 13  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard