Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 23 - Challenger (€64,000) - Nottingham (grass) - doubles


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 57998
Date:
RE: Week 23 - Challenger (€64,000) - Nottingham (grass) - doubles


QF:  (1) Santiago González & Scott Lipsky (MEX/USA) vs (WC) Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski WR 616 bleh

Tough, but I don't think the alternative would have been very much easier!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 57998
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:
R1:  (WC) Lewis Burton & Dan Evans WR 886 vs (3) Jamie Murray & John Peers (AUS) WR 133

First set in the bag for the third seeds by 6-3.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Up the Skupski's! They thrash the #1 seeds.

QF: (WC) Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski WR 616 defeated (1) Santiago González & Scott Lipsky (MEX/USA) 6-4 6-2

SF: (WC) Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski WR 616 vs. (4) Sanchai Ratiwatana/Sonchat Ratiwatana (THA/THA)


Edit: add in SF details



-- Edited by blob on Thursday 6th of June 2013 05:04:45 PM

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 57998
Date:

blob wrote:

Up the Skupski's! They thrash the #1 seeds.

QF: (WC) Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski WR 616 defeated (1) Santiago González & Scott Lipsky (MEX/USA) 6-4 6-2

SF: (WC) Ken Skupski & Neal Skupski WR 616 vs. (4) Sanchai Ratiwatana/Sonchat Ratiwatana (THA/THA)


I never saw that coming!   What a super win & great news to get home to!   If they can brush aside the top seeds so easily, the "Ratis", as I call them, should be a pushover! wink  33 guaranteed ranking points in the bag! biggrin



-- Edited by Stircrazy on Thursday 6th of June 2013 06:40:31 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 57998
Date:

QF:  (3) Jamie Murray & John Peers (AUS) WR 133 defeated Jamie Delgado & Matt Ebden (AUS) WR 166 by 7-6(3) 6-0

******

Jamie's most enduring former partner on the opposite side of the net in the semi:

SF:  (3) Jamie Murray & John Peers (AUS) WR 133 vs (2) Eric Butorac & Rajeev Ram (USA/USA) WR 88



-- Edited by Stircrazy on Thursday 6th of June 2013 06:21:13 PM

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

The Skupski's claim the first set 6-4

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Also a break up in the second - the Skupski's are the ones in the black shorts and bright yellow tops
6-4 3-1*

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17420
Date:

It won't be long before Neal has a decent doubles ranking and then will not need a wildcard to play with Ken

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

That's a really good win. Well done the Skupskis!

__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Date:

Have Ken or Neal explicitly ruled out the idea of a long term partnership with each other? If they are able to compete so well at challenger level it must be a viable option financially - and surely both would be more relaxed room sharing, practising etc. with each other than a partner?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

murray_2k9 wrote:

Have Ken or Neal explicitly ruled out the idea of a long term partnership with each other? If they are able to compete so well at challenger level it must be a viable option financially - and surely both would be more relaxed room sharing, practising etc. with each other than a partner?


The fact that they have set up a SkupskiBros account on Twitter makes it seem more likely that they have explicity ruled it in! I would guess they are hoping to get WCs throughout the grass court season and to pick up enough points over the next few weeks for them to get into Challengers together direct.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13907
Date:

steven wrote:
murray_2k9 wrote:

Have Ken or Neal explicitly ruled out the idea of a long term partnership with each other? If they are able to compete so well at challenger level it must be a viable option financially - and surely both would be more relaxed room sharing, practising etc. with each other than a partner?


The fact that they have set up a SkupskiBros account on Twitter makes it seem more likely that they have explicity ruled it in! I would guess they are hoping to get WCs throughout the grass court season and to pick up enough points over the next few weeks for them to get into Challengers together direct.


 http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/other-sport/tennis/grand-slams-target-tennis-stars-4029523



__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Date:

Brilliant - nice to see a stable, all-British partnership get off to a strong start. Thanks for the article wolf - good read! I hadn't considered the logistical issue of the age gap, which seems to be the main reason the partnership is just coming together now.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5110
Date:

Stircrazy got there first



-- Edited by blob on Friday 7th of June 2013 04:16:21 PM

__________________

Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Wonderful results. Well done, Mr Murray, and welcome to a good new team. (Might this lead to more WCs for Skupskis?)



-- Edited by Spectator on Friday 7th of June 2013 04:56:52 PM

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4  >  Last»  | Page of 4  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard