Ed's 2nd Futures singles title (and 2nd in 3 weeks, of course) - he is now 16-2 in 2013 (1-2 v USA, 16-0 v everyone else) and is very likely to crack the top 400 on Monday week
Cracking win for Ed!
Er, Steven. Maths has never been my strong point (struggle without a calculator! ( ), but if he's 1-2 vs the US, doesn't that make him 15-0 vs the rest?
A bit weird for me as I know two other Ed Corries, an Edwin & an Edward (their Dave Gorman adventure would be easy!)
I've read with interest the various thoughts on where and how various players should manage their schedules to best manage their aspirations.
Perhaps Ed might have a rethink and adjust his sights upwards in terms of quality of opposition, to attempt to strike while the iron, or at least the form, is hot, in a similar manner to how Sam Murray has gone from 10K's to regular 75-100k entry, with decent returns, after something seemed to click at the end of last year.
If indeed, its even possible - for Josh G and others, I understand it just doesn't appear viable.
__________________
Data I post, opinions I offer, 'facts' I assert, are almost certainly all stupidly wrong.
Ed's 2nd Futures singles title (and 2nd in 3 weeks, of course) - he is now 16-2 in 2013 (1-2 v USA, 16-0 v everyone else) and is very likely to crack the top 400 on Monday week
Cracking win for Ed!
Er, Steven. Maths has never been my strong point (struggle without a calculator! ( ), but if he's 1-2 vs the US, doesn't that make him 15-0 vs the rest?
Oops, typo time! Still, a good check that you're on the ball
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
While I agree that Ed should be clearly aiming to progress to challengers, I do think there is an arguement for building up a more solid ranking points base first by racking up quite a lot more futures points if he can. This would then give him a more solid base for a run of challengers even if things didn't initially go well there.
If bearing in mind he is not some youngster ( if not exactly old ) and feeling he can capitalise on his current form, he wants to move earlier, then fair enough. It's really just a viewpoint and a question of timing his general move up.
I do certainly agree that he doesn't want ti be settling for ( especially 10K ) futures.
Great form from Ed though this has been, I actually don't see the rush to step up. Challengers at the moment are stronger than in the past, to do another block of four 10k's in UK might not be a bad thing. The summer will be interesting for Ed as well but, if he continues to do well, the period after the grass finishes may be a better time to launch into challengers(?)
Would probably agree with consensus to wait until after next block of GB futures. But by april time throwing some bigger tournaments in. Personally, post injury, I'd say the same for Oli (remember him?!) and even Kyle, if his ranking moves up another 100 places or more.
Back now from Bidston,Wirral and a few observations:
Nice little club, it was a little chilly which made the courts a little slow, but there was a really good number of spectators(approx 120) which made for a nice atmosphere.
Ed won the match fairly comfortably after the first nine games were fairly close, but Dan never really looked like breaking and Ed had three breaks on the trot.
As for the two players - Dan made a lot more errors, double faulted at crucial times and looked more fatigued than Ed early on. Dan big serve is his main weapon and it wasn't firing consistently. If he can cut down the errors, he'll be there or there about inn 10K and 15K, but i cannot see him progressing at a much higher level.
Ed was a bit shorter in height, but has a good all round game. He mixs his serves up well and has a very good second server kicker. He won quite a few points with the cross court slice which he followed in to the net and Dan struggled to return. He looks comfortable around the net and also from the back court and moves quite well round the court. The big advantage he did was that he didn't make too many errors, kept the ball in play and moved Dan around the court. He has no big weapons, but is very capable of grinding out results at this level. Can see his ranking going to around 250 by the end of the year, but i'm not sure how he would get on in the challengers he will have to compete in against players that have big weapons.
Interesting interview after thematch with Ed, where he will be training for the next couple of weeks(his brother is his coach) and then playing the next set of 10K's in GB. I'm hoping his ranking will probably get him a potential seeding.
As for playing at this level, i'm not sure how players survive - Ed won £907 for winning and Dan @£550. So even with Ed winning 2 and runner up in the other and picking up £2300, he and his brother have probably had 3 weeks in hotels, which will eat into a large proportion of this money. I feel sorry for those that travel and don't get to at least the semi's. It must be a hard life for players at this level unless you have financial backing.
The interviewer is in good form. e.g. "Last 3 Saturdays, Ed Corrie in a Final. Won't you feel a bit lonely next Saturday?"
It's pretty clear too that Lewis is (understandably) keen to convince Neal not to 'do a Jamie' i.e. ditch him for his brother when anything good comes up!
-- Edited by steven on Tuesday 12th of February 2013 01:29:43 PM
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!