I spoke to Leon about this at Nottingham and he put up a perfectly reasoned argument for the current strategy. Reasons for: 1. Saved £65000 to date 2. GB players have been mopping up most of the points, he gave me some stats on that as well. 3. We don't have enough players around the top 200 level who would benefit from holding more challengers, basically foreign players would come in and mop up the points and the prize money. 4. The idea is to have 26 British based tournaments mostly futures including a small number of high level British tour events so that players that have no funding don't have to leave the country and can bulid up points/ prize money without the extra cost of travelling abroad. The bonus scheme is also there to supplement these types of players earnings. 5. As soon as we get more Challenger ranked players( hopefully very soon ) the schedule will be revisited and the spread will be changed again.
hmmm now that you put it like that the current schedule sounds much more sensible than I'd given it credit for...I guess on that thinking the 2nd Nottingham challenger is justified, in that as a Grasscourt event the same week as Queen's (where only a few British players get to play) it reduces the number of higher ranked grasscourters coming in and moping up the points, giving the lower ranked Brits a better chance at a Challenger level event...although in practice it doesn't work nearly as well as that!
-- Edited by The Knight on Thursday 27th of June 2013 08:52:16 PM
I spoke to Leon about this at Nottingham and he put up a perfectly reasoned argument for the current strategy. Reasons for: 1. Saved £65000 to date 2. GB players have been mopping up most of the points, he gave me some stats on that as well. 3. We don't have enough players around the top 200 level who would benefit from holding more challengers, basically foreign players would come in and mop up the points and the prize money. 4. The idea is to have 26 British based tournaments mostly futures including a small number of high level British tour events so that players that have no funding don't have to leave the country and can bulid up points/ prize money without the extra cost of travelling abroad. The bonus scheme is also there to supplement these types of players earnings. 5. As soon as we get more Challenger ranked players( hopefully very soon ) the schedule will be revisited and the spread will be changed again.
I spoke to Leon about this at Nottingham and he put up a perfectly reasoned argument for the current strategy. Reasons for: 1. Saved £65000 to date 2. GB players have been mopping up most of the points, he gave me some stats on that as well. 3. We don't have enough players around the top 200 level who would benefit from holding more challengers, basically foreign players would come in and mop up the points and the prize money. 4. The idea is to have 26 British based tournaments mostly futures including a small number of high level British tour events so that players that have no funding don't have to leave the country and can bulid up points/ prize money without the extra cost of travelling abroad. The bonus scheme is also there to supplement these types of players earnings. 5. As soon as we get more Challenger ranked players( hopefully very soon ) the schedule will be revisited and the spread will be changed again.
Point one, the financial saving, seems fair.
But points 2 and 3 seem to imply that the LTA's only goal is to somehow provide some 'cheap' points and 'cheap' cash for the current GB players.
This seems extremely short-sighted.
In my view, the LTA should be trying to raise the bar of tennis overall in the UK. For the current players, the up-and-coming players and the public who are both supporters (providers of cash) and 'providers' of potential players in the future.
Show-casing a bit of high quality tennis throughout the year, not just Wimbledon and immediately pre-Wimbledon, would be of huge benefit to a lot of our players, and to aspiring players.
But instead we have a year full of lowly futures and then a sudden feeding-frenzy of Wimbledon and pre-Wimbeldon very high challengers. No wonder the press go nuts. And looking at all the players who won a match in the Qualifiers, or almost won a match in the MD (all against far higher ranked players) - it's not a huge number but it's not nothing - if it'd been a 'normal' 35 or 50k, those numbers might be three times that - the home benefit can play a very important role.
I will add more to this tomorrow, I am currently too drunk to say much, but I must immediately respond to point 1, that the LTA saved "£65000". This is absolute peanuts, it is roughly 0.1% of the LTA's budget. To cite it as a reason to justify the strategy is quite simply pathetic.
Hopefully with so many British players moving into the 250-500 ranking, shouldn't the LTA look to switch some of the 10K tournaments into 15K's and start to throw in a few more 25K challengers?
Big GB automatic entries into main draw for Nottingham and Chiswick.