Thanks for bringing this one back - always interesting to see how things can change so quickly . . .
Dan C. will (I believe) be in the top 350 next week (wk 33) so with Kyle (definitely) and Dave (hopefully) that'll sort that one out.
I'm confident that Ed can be top 250 (and probably Alex too, although I haven't seen him play for a long while). May not be this year though - I don't think he'll go flying through, but he will get there.
I get the feeling that our youngsters are ready to break through a bit - Liam, Luke, JWH - will depend on their plans but top 700 is very attainable. Will take them a couple of years to really get going in adult tennis though. Also, watched George Coupland play one match and thought that if he;s serious and ready to work he could make big leaps with no problem. The college kids also seemed impressive (Glasspool, Salisbury etc.) but they've got studies left to do.
I think both James (just) and Dan can make top 100. Plenty of time. James (even in the horrid matches he's lost) looks a far better player than he did only a year or two ago. Dan is difficult to quantify (!) - watch this space . . .
Don't really know the Ashley/Marcus/Tom contingent . . .
Anyway, we'll see (stating the obvious . . . )
NB Obviously Oli is the big wild card in the pack - potential to suddenly come out of nowhere ???. . (cross fingers)
-- Edited by Coup Droit on Sunday 4th of August 2013 09:30:18 AM
So it appears we have cracked the 700 barrier with our 25th ranked player, David Rice, now ranked at 687. Congratulations to all those who have helped break the barrier, but now is a time to push on and not to sit on ones laurels.
So what is the next target we should be setting ?
30 players inside the top 700 25 players inside the top 600 15 players inside the top 500 10 players inside the top 350 5 players inside the top 250 2 players inside the top 100
There are players coming up (see paulisi post above) who could help push us over the first two targets although there are one or two (Bloomers & Burn) who will probably be moving the other way. I think Tom Burn has the potential to go higher but his priorities seem to have changed.
So how many of my predictions above will come true before the end of the season ?
Updated thoughts - it makes it a touch harder Jamie, Josh and Tom B retiring
30 players inside the top 700 - need 3 or 4 to break through, Broady, JWH most likely
25 players inside the top 600 - I think we got to 24 at one stage
15 players inside the top 500 - target complete, 20 is more likely
10 players inside the top 350 -getting close, Boggo and Baker going down rankings, so need Kyle, Rice and another to jump into bracket
5 players inside the top 250 - 3 inside top 200, then a big gap
2 players inside the top 100 - potential, but a lot of points to collect to get anywhere near for James or Dan
Have to be honest and when I set these "targets", I always thought the last one was the least likely. And as mentioned previously, somewhere hidden away in a tournament thread, I did pose the question of 20 in the top 500. For some reason, when I made the post above, I "bottled it" on that one.
Bob, I do recall you posing the question of 20 in the top 500,
I remember guffawing at such unrealism, that in my view it was assuming too many players went as well as hoped with hardly any failures. Historically it just wouldn't happen. In truth I must admit it has gone rather well in the 400 - 600 range.
Goodall will drop out the top 500 on Monday week taking the top 500 figure back down from 18 to 17. But we are still quite close.
I the short term, Golding and Goodall just need a few points and if say Gabb or Marsalek could have a great week, 20 is currently much more feasible then I ever imagined. Longer term others may come through.
It still may not happen, but it was a brave and much better shout than I ever imagined, Bob.
The BBC really do need to get their act together regards tennis, on this weeks women's ranking list they have Maria Kirilenko ranked 12 AND 16. They also have Lisa Whybourn listed as one of the Brits inside the top 250 even though her ranking of 278 is clearly shown
"15 players inside the top 500 - target complete, 20 is more likely"
Marzi, Gabb and Oli knocking on the door.
I think 15 players in the top 400 may be achievable at some stage.
Yes, the '15 in the top 400' is interesting and very do-able - 8 players currently in the 400s, all of them (bar Josh G.) taking it seriously, playing hard, doing well (or well-ish) . . . some have got serious points to come off soon though . . .
But there's only 10 points difference between WR 421 and 380 so it's very close . . .
OK. Up to 19 next week. I relly need someone to help me out here.
So come on Marzi / Rich G. A really good couple of weeks from one of you please (or preferably both), although it is going to be hard for Rich G, given he is not actually playing this week
Maybe Liam or JWH can bolt from the pack over the next few weeks as well. Let's hope so. May need a couple as Josh G (unless he reappears in a tournament) is likely to drop out at the end of the US Open fortnight.
Surprising that Gabb is not playing the GB 10ks coming up. He's going out to Turkey.
Gabb and Marzi are the obvious choices. Broady and JWH have potential, but need 30+ pts to break in.
I'm starting to think 30 players inside the top 700 is possible as is 15 inside the top 400 and possibly 10 inside the top 300 at some stage
Murray
Ward j
Evans
Corrie
Klein
Ward a
Cox
Boggo
Kyle
10 in the top 300 would be good, but I think Klein will struggle to get back in there without a significant upturn in form - he has around a quarter of his points coming off in the next 4 weeks.
Similarly with Boggo, who by the end of next week won't have played for 5 weeks at what is usually a good time of year for him so must be struggling with his back or similar niggles, I assume
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
I was just looking at who has big points to defend for the rest of the year and how the rankings would pan out at the end of Dec.
Andy Murray obviously has the largest amount of points to defend, but then it is(assuming I can add up), plus a few more not added:
A Ward 59 Pauffley 51 Boggo 42 Baker 41 Klein 37 Milton 37 Edmund 31 Evans 29 Smethurst 28 Hewitt 22 Golding 21 Burn 20 Bloomers 18
Again using Steven's tables which include the latest points(Sheffield etc) and I have added Josh M's 5pts for qualifying, these would be the worst case scenarios for counting ranking points at end of Dec(hopefully no big errors!!), assuming no further points:
Murray 5790 Evans 331 Ward 278 Cox 146 Corrie 111 Edmund 102 Rice 92 Hewitt 83 Willis 81 Tom F 68 Baker 65 Smethurst 65 Klein 63 A Ward 59 Boggo 57 Gabb 53 Golding 50 Goodall 50 Broady 42 Milton 35 Fitzy 35 Pauffley 33 Marzi 29 JWH 26 Carpenter 20 Burton 19 Bloomers 16 Carter 15 Short 14 Coupland 14 Slabba 6 Bambo 6 Burn 0
Guaranteed 3 inside top 200 4 inside top 300 6 inside top 400 12 inside top 500 19 inside top 600 22 inside top 700
Bob's 20 inside top 500 will need to find another 8 - Alex W and Klein should get there points. Then the remainder is questionable. Boggo(if he returns) and Golding must be contenders. Gabb and Broady are possibilities. Cannot see anyone else get there unless Josh G plays a few tournaments.
-- Edited by paulisi on Sunday 8th of September 2013 11:59:31 AM
Re Bob's mission of 20 in the top 500, I agree year end looks problematic. Also, with particular reference to Jamie, 65 points is not actually "guaranteed", although is just top 500 currently.
I'd say shorter term offers a much greater chance. Josh Milton's challenger qualifying points are useful here.
I cannot see 20 GB male players in the top 500 happening for a good while now, so maybe we should go for a more realistic target:
10 GB male players in the top 300 is definitely doable - maybe even pushing the boat out and by Wimbledon qualifying have at least 2 direct entries to Wimbledon and 5 more who automatically qualify for wildcards?