Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 40- WTA Premier ($4.8M) - Beijing, China - Hard


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:
Week 40- WTA Premier ($4.8M) - Beijing, China - Hard


Julia Carrot wrote:
Peter too wrote:

Q1: ROBSON, Laura (GBR) 4 57 beat MUGURUZA, Garbine (ESP) 106 6-3 6-3
Q1: WATSON, Heather (GBR) 12 78 beat TIAN, Ran (CHN) WC 561 7-5 6-2

Q2: ROBSON, Laura (GBR) 4 57 v GIORGI, Camila (ITA) 95
Q2: WATSON, Heather (GBR) 12 78 v LARSSON, Johanna (SWE) 15 84

Heather beat Larsson in three last year.


 But I think it's Laura that has to beat her this year according to the draw I'm looking at ?


Interesting. Draw order has definitely changed.

Here is what I wrote when the original draw first came out.

Laura Robson (4) Vs Garbine Muguraza
Then either Julia Cohen or Johanna Larsson (15)
Should get through that I think if she's recovered from Guangzhou sufficiently well.

Heather Watson (12) vs WC Ran Tian
Then either Mandy Minella (6) or Camilla Giorgi

Can't see why it's changed, or why the two GB players would have had their sets of matches switched in particular.

Weird!

Addition: BBC red button Tennis still carrying the old match ups as nex for our girls.

Oh, and I see Serena & Venus have succumbed to their seasonal flu again Doubts about Azarenka playing here too.



-- Edited by NotAClue on Friday 28th of September 2012 10:58:29 AM

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2559
Date:

I doubt it would change.
It's what we originally thought. Both should win those matches.



-- Edited by Maza1987 on Friday 28th of September 2012 11:13:53 AM

__________________



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 39542
Date:

SMC1809 wrote:

The draw I'm looking at still shows Heather v Giorgi.


 

Yes,  i.e. as per http://www.chinaopen.com.cn/en/draws.html 

And this is the one that makes sense.  The top 8 qualifying seeds would be due to play the 9 - 16 seeds.  Not seed 12 v 15, and 4 v the player who beat 6.



-- Edited by indiana on Friday 28th of September 2012 11:20:37 AM

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Bit of a shock to wake up and find Heather set point down at 3-5 30-40*, but she has at least recovered to 5-5

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5519
Date:

She was just stringing us along. Now 7-5.

__________________


Improver

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:

Even more of a shock when, according to the tournament website live scoring, Heather lost the first set 6-2 and was completely outplayed in all stats.

The live score then inexplicably changed to show a completely different set of scores and stats. Had they been following the wrong game? Heather now (apparently) taking the first set 7-5



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5519
Date:

Hev wraps it up 7-5 6-2.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5519
Date:

And she'll play Giorgi next.

__________________


ATP qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2847
Date:

Dodgy start by Heather, but comfortable in the end.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5519
Date:

Laura match on the live-score now.

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

SMC1809 wrote:

Laura match on the live-score now.


And under way. Laura receiving first.

Live score jumped right to Laura *1-2 and facing two break points! Then broken.



__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

First set Laura 6-3
3 breaks to 1, won 58% of points, looking good.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5519
Date:

Now *4-3 up.

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

NotAClue wrote:

First set Laura 6-3
3 breaks to 1, won 58% of points, looking good.


 This from the Beijing Open Live score - given the glirch mentioned earlier for Heather's game, thought I'd better mention it, in case the same thing happens again. hmm



__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 183
Date:

Looking good at 4-1* in the second.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 414  >  Last»  | Page of 14  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard