Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Wimbledon 'Battle of the Boards' pick em - now back on - closing Monday 11.30 UK
To BOTB or not to BOTB? [17 vote(s)]

Yes - put up entry form even if results delayed by a week or more
76.5%
No - leave it until a slam where we can do BOTB properly again
23.5%


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11934
Date:
RE: Wimbledon - to BOTB or not to BOTB, that is the question ...


Unit shows signs of struggling with multi-tasking, hmm I wonder if a hardware upgrade maybe needed, possibly reached software's capacity.

__________________

 

Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.


www.alexbogdanovic.com



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

Count Zero wrote:

Unit shows signs of struggling with multi-tasking, hmm I wonder if a hardware upgrade maybe needed, possibly reached software's capacity.


It certainly feels like that today. cry My brain, oops I mean processor, could do with at least a 2 GB RAM upgrade and a few co-processors if the budget will rise to it! wink



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html

Jan


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 7948
Date:

we'll all have a whip round!!!

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Online
Posts: 4027
Date:

Shame, but can't be helped, roll on next year.

__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1394
Date:
RE: Wimbledon 'Battle of the Boards' pick em - now back on - closing Monday 11.30 UK


Ok, I'm in

__________________


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 688
Date:

Rocking Good News! In that case, I'm gonna make my comeback....
Many thanks Steven and Bethan.

__________________
'The first three-figure riser'
Montréal Masters 'Battle of the Boards' pick 'em 2009


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Online
Posts: 4027
Date:

Done, mine, but as I don't really follow the men's game, I've had to make alot of guesses. I don't suppose there's one for the women?

__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Grand Slam Champion

Status: Online
Posts: 4027
Date:

imoen wrote:

 That's me!

 I don't post on here as much as I used to (don't have as much time as I'd like to do so) but I've always helped Steven with the pickems in the background.

 Thanks to those who have already entered - keep the picks rolling in!!


 Nice to meet you, this solves another mystery of the board!



__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Admin: Moderator+Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7255
Date:

the longer you stay on here the more mysteries will be revealed

we don't currently run one for the women but don't worry about making lots of guesses that's all we all do. You'll learn soon enough which players always let you down (commonly known as muppets)!

__________________

To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty


Oscar Wilde



Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:

Huge thanks to Steven and Bethan for runnning this competition again. I remember that I had the same problem on a previous occasion and wonder if anyone else has experienced the same thing - when I upload the entry form the automatic filling in of my picks does not happen. I tried filling in the form from rounds 2 onwards with all the slots as NOT YET PREDICTED (challenging to read across the lines and hope you've ticked the right box) but it didn't send. I've managed to complete my entry on another laptop with no problem. I realise that no solution is likely under the current pressure of work but just mention it to see if it's just my problem or if others experience the same thing. If I remember correctly, Steven couldn't suggest any reason for this.

Good luck, can't wait for tomorrow but just wondering how quickly my frustration at the muppets will begin. Taking part has already made this slam more interesting than RG.

__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2380
Date:

Mahut-Isner in round 2? haha not again

__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Online
Posts: 4027
Date:

The Knight wrote:

Mahut-Isner in round 2? haha not again


 I know, I saw that and just laughed, what are the odds??



__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 523
Date:

Helen40 wrote:
The Knight wrote:

Mahut-Isner in round 2? haha not again


 I know, I saw that and just laughed, what are the odds??


  they played each other in the 1st round last year did they not? isner won in straight sets i think.



__________________


Grand Slam Champion

Status: Online
Posts: 4027
Date:

Not sure which round, but certainly if they meet this year it's be three years on the trot.

__________________

Face your fears........Live your dreams!



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:

eblunt wrote:

Well it's here again. Every bit as predictable as the "first cuckoo of spring" is the "first muppet of Wimby", who will it be. Surely no-one could be daft enough to expect Donkey to progess, so he's out of the frame. That evergreen muppet Gulbis has no takers whatsover it appears ... maybe people have finally learned. AlMUGro will do what he does does best ..... the exact opposite of what was expected. Flake will be flakey, that's for sure, but even the crumbliest flakiest player isn't picked by a majority. No it has to be a GEM, that's where my money is.


Good summary - having a quick skim down the %s, AlMUGro (94%) is a definite possiblity, or maybe GillEs siMon against PHM, though I'd prefer it to be a VDM, i.e. Andreev against Oli.

The other matches either don't seem to have much upset potential or it wouldn't be a huge shock if the less-picked player won.

Helen - a 'muppet' in BOTB terms is a player who delights in doing what the opposite of what you've picked him to do. The kind of player who goes very deep in a tournament once in a while, then messes up your BOTB entry by losing to lower-ranked players again and again, before going deep in a tournament once more the moment you finally give up on him and pick him to go out early ... which of course usually means the whole sorry cycle of pain starts again! no

In the past, classic examples have been 'Dammit' Gasquet, 'Numpty' Nalby, Gonzo (who even shared his name with a real muppet), GEMremy Chardy, etc. Newer examples might include Ernests 'so bad they named him twice' Gulbis (possibly the most annoying player of all time, though everyone's given up picking him now) and Dimi, the 'baby Fed' guaranteed to leave you Fed up.

A GEM is a garlic-eating malingerer, with similar shorthand for other nationalities, e.g. VDMs (Russian), PEMs (Spanish), HEM (Muzz) - I'll leave you to guess those! wink However, the sheer number of French players and their utter unreliability (or 'gallic flair' as they like to call it) means 'we tend to use 'GEM' far more often than anything else. smile

There is also #GEMpower for those rare tournaments where all the GEMs decide to perform at once, though obviously it tends not to last much past the last 16 even in those cases.



-- Edited by steven on Monday 25th of June 2012 10:09:22 AM

__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html

«First  <  1 2 3 46  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard