The little beauty!   It seems as though he never knows when he's beaten!   I can't help feeling, though, that he deserves better than only 15 measly points for a win like that!  Career best, I presume?

Stircrazy wrote:

---

The little beauty!   It seems as though he never knows when he's beaten!   I can't help feeling, though, that he deserves better than only 15 measly points for a win like that!  Career best, I presume?

---

  Well done Baker. I think his career best win was against Huyng Taik-Lee or soemthing like that at Queens? He was ranked in the 30's. Plus he beat Calleri in a dead rubber on clay? I may be completely wrong with this information as I'm just going by memory. 

steven wrote:

---

Stircrazy wrote:

---

The little beauty!   It seems as though he never knows when he's beaten!   I can't help feeling, though, that he deserves better than only 15 measly points for a win like that!  Career best, I presume?

---

1)  The Calleri win in DC was his career best, but I have a feeling that might be his biggest scalp otherwise.

[...]

2)  Jamie has now won 7 matches in a row and will almost certainly take out his 2007 career high at last - I make him about WR 206 at the moment.

[...]

3)  QF: Jamie Baker WR 215 v Peter Polansky (CAN) WR 203 (CH 164 in 2009)

H2H 0-2 - 3 sets in 2010, 2 t/bs in 2011, both in N America.

---

1)  Thanks for setting me straight, Steven.   I had a vague  recollection of the DC tie, but didn't remember Calleri being quite so highly ranked.

2)    And surely very near the front of the queue for a wild card entry to SW19?

3)  I'd feel more confident about an eighth win in row, were it not for that head-to-head.  Still, he never gives up...