Stircrazy wrote:Some decent news again this evening:
L32: (Q) Matthew Short WR 932 lost to (5) Nicholas Monroe (USA) WR 310 by 7-6(9) 1-6 3-6 (Matt obviously gave Nick a run for his money! )
L32: (Q) Andrew Gregory WR 1287 lost to (LL) Boris Nicola Bakalov (BUL) WR 810 by 2-5 rtd (hope it's not a serious problem)
L32: Jamie Baker WR 398 defeated (6) Adam el Mihdawy (USA) WR 366 by 0 & 0!
L32: (Q) Tim Bradshaw WR 1139 defeated (Q) Daniel Danilovic (SWE) WR 844 by 2 & 3
L16: (LL) Boris Nicola Bakalov (BUL) WR 810 vs Jamie Baker WR 398
L16: (7) Arnau Brugues (ESP) WR 375 vs (Q) Tim Bradshaw WR 1139
Just to complete the set, from yesterday:
L16: Alex Bogdanovic WR 396 vs Michael McClune (USA) WR 702*
* banana skin alert!
It's not often you see an unseeded Brit double bagel a seed! Unless el Mihdawy was injured/ill early on and was honourable enough to limp through the match anyway, that's quite a result!
That's a good win for Tim too - not only is Danilovic ranked about 300 places higher, he's also been top 500 and has beaten Bloomers (just last year), Baker and Flembo in the past.
It looks like Shorty did very well to edge that 1st set tiebreak, but the scoreline in the remaining two sets suggests that Monroe may have woken up after that!
Just as it looked like Andrew was finally getting some luck (with Gregorc pulling out) after all the troubles he's had since his switch from AUS to GB last year, the poor guy has to retire - how unlucky can you get?
Still, some good should still come of Gregorc's w/d, with Bakalov playing Jamie next. The Bulgarian's ranking of 810 is a CH - at the age of 30!
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
steven do you still have those stats somewhere on Boggo's win % per round.
hopefully both guys can get the win here, so we're guaranteed a finalist (no prizes for guessing who i'm going for). the shame is even if the guys lose today they may find they can't make Tallahassee Q sign in anyway. shame it's not a Sat final, at least then you'll have made the SF's to miss out on qualies next week.
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
steven do you still have those stats somewhere on Boggo's win % per round.
hopefully both guys can get the win here, so we're guaranteed a finalist (no prizes for guessing who i'm going for). the shame is even if the guys lose today they may find they can't make Tallahassee Q sign in anyway. shame it's not a Sat final, at least then you'll have made the SF's to miss out on qualies next week.
They're both playing at 10 am local time and assuming Tallahassee sign-in closes at 9 pm, the only realistic option (based on a VERY quick search) appears to be the 1.01 pm flight from Little Rock via Atlanta (almost certainly too tight even if they lose in straight sets, since I doubt the airport is close to the tennis centre in Little Rock and they won't have tickets yet either) - that arrives in Tallahassee at 6.38 pm, everything else arrives at 8.48 pm or later.
It does seem a bit thoughtless to have a Sunday Final in a Futures event the week before a nearby Challenger, given that SEs to the higher level event won't be available however well players do here.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
steven do you still have those stats somewhere on Boggo's win % per round.
In Challengers only, his round reached %s in 157 events are:
R1: 49%, R2: 21%, QF: 17%, SF: 5%, RU: 3%, WI: 6%
... and his win %s in each round are:
R1: 51%, R2: 59%, QF: 45%, SF: 62%, FI: 69%
So yes, in Challengers at least, the QF round still tends to be the biggest banana skin - his record when he reaches SFs and beyond is very good.
Oddly enough, his record in Futures this year shows a similar pattern (albeit based on just 5 events!) - win %s in each round are:
R1: 80%, R2: 75%, QF: 33%, SF: 100%, FI: 100%
Even in 2003/4 (the last time he played Futures before this year), the QF round seems to have been the biggest danger zone. I have no idea why this pattern has continued for so long though!
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Thanks Steven, it's funny how the QF seem to be the biggest stepping stone, and we know generally it's not like those loses are generally to seeds etc, it could almost be anyone.
Btw when you checked those flight details did you check the cost. could be a factor too, esp for the guys that aren't on Aegon.
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.