Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 11 - ITF ($100+HK) - Nassau, Bahamas Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18102
Date:
RE: Week 11 - ITF ($100+HK) - Nassau, Bahamas Hard


I have watched a few matches involving top women players where one has clearly adopted the tactic of going for her second serve about as much as the first to prevent her opponent taking charge in the rally, and stopping her getting any rhythm on return (one with Justine Henin in Sydney comes to mind - she served 15-20 doubles but won), so although none do it regularly it's a tactic employed on occasions.

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1677
Date:

To work out if its true simply calculate if "%1st serve in" x "%point won on 1st serve"  > "%2nd serve won"

If you apply this to the final stages of the Australian open:

Match Player %1st in %1st won Result %2nd won Won Match Better Strategy
Final Kim Clijsters 65 66 42.9 40 Yes Yes
Li Na 72 52 37.44 41
Semi Wozniaki 64 57 36.48 46
Li Na 64 66 42.24 36 Yes Yes
Kim Clijsters 63 77 48.51 56 Yes
Zvonareva 65 68 44.2 28 Yes
Quarters Radwanska 83 50 41.5 57
Kim Clijsters 65.7 65.9 43.3 43.5 Yes
Kvitova 60 48 28.8 32
Zvonareva 59 70 41.3 48 Yes
Schavone 56 57 31.92 42
Wozniaki 67 63 42.21 46 Yes
Petkovic 73 49 35.77 40
Li Na 65 74 48.1 56 Yes

So assuming that the probabilty of serving a fault when hitting a 2nd serve at 1st serve speed is the same as hitting a 1st serve at 1st serve speed, there were only 3 / 14 occasions where a player would have been better off, and only once was it the losing player. Of course, that assumption is wrong - the added pressure on the 2nd serve would reduce the change of it going in.



-- Edited by RBBOT on Friday 18th of March 2011 07:48:42 PM

__________________
«First  <  116 17 18 | Page of 18  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard