Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 33 - Cincinnati Masters (ATP 1000 Series) - QF: Andy vs Mardy Fish


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57725
Date:
Week 33 - Cincinnati Masters (ATP 1000 Series) - QF: Andy vs Mardy Fish


Well, Andy's staggered into the quarters courtesy of two unconvincing three-set wins agin Chardy & Gulbis.  The head-to-head with the Mardy One stands at 3-3, Fish having won the last two encounters, the more recent one at Queen's, where Andy was the defending champion, in three sets in June.  The earlier Fish win occurred when Andy was really suffering after his defeat by Rog in the final of the AO:  4 & 4 at the Miami Masters in March.  Question is, how much does he want it this time?  How much is he already looking ahead to the USO?  Is Fish going to be playing him at yet another fortuitous moment?  Much as I'd like to see him defend his losing semi-finalist points from last year, I fear this QF is going to be a bridge too far... hmm

$64,000 question to the ATP:  why are these North American Masters Series events bunched so tightly together in advance of the USO?  The players barely have a chance to draw breath after one before there's another under way!!!  Are TPTB trying to ensure that the spoils are spread more "equitably" by making it well-nigh impossible for just one of the best players to dominate & pick ALL the plums? evileye

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40755
Date:

Good question.  Why can't Canada say be a week earlier ???    Successive weeks and then one week gap to the US Open is just silly.

Anyway, I'd guess at least Andy will have more success on return against Fish than Dammit who won 8 / 48 points and didn't take Fish to deuce once on return.

I'm kinda not too bothered about the result, just please let it not be a 3 set toilier.

__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2380
Date:

they used to have this thing before the French Open too until Madrid came along and one week gaps between all the masters

__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

In contrast, Fed got a bye, a retirement in the first set and a walkover!

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57725
Date:

Madeline wrote:

In contrast, Fed got a bye, a retirement in the first set and a walkover!



Fix! disbelief

 



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
Date:

I'm sure one of the commentators said last week that the players had actually requested a change to the calendar and for the tournaments to be grouped together like this.

__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:


Stircrazy wrote:

 

Madeline wrote:

In contrast, Fed got a bye, a retirement in the first set and a walkover!



Fix! disbelief



Those numbered Swiss bank accounts. . .rolleyes.gif

 



__________________
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:

Madeline wrote:

In contrast, Fed got a bye, a retirement in the first set and a walkover!




The way Fed is playing at the moment he could do with playing a bit more.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40755
Date:

RJA wrote:

Madeline wrote:

In contrast, Fed got a bye, a retirement in the first set and a walkover!




The way Fed is playing at the moment he could do with playing a bit more.




Oh, I'm already waiting if things don't go to plan at the US Open that it was because he hadn't played enough  wink.gif



__________________
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:

Another lunchtime match for Andy tomorrow. Doubles match first up at 15:00 BST followed by Andy (no earlier than 17:00 BST)

__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

His hints fell on deaf ears.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40755
Date:

Oh had Andy been droppoing hints about his early schedule in the sun here, following on from no night matches at Toronto ?   I'd been guessing it wasn't his choice !
 
I kind of saw how Toronto was playing out, allowing for the previous day's night match and keeping prospective later oppponents playing about the same time left Andy looking likely to be earlyish each day.

Here, with prospective later opponents ( Muzza and Roddick ) playing at either ends of the day, they could really have gone either way and I would have thought more logically had their quarters the later ones.  I get the impression a prospective Nadal / Fed semi is at this stage looked on as being the later semi.  For there was to me, with Roger's day off and Nadal playing late in the afternoon but not the night match, every opportunity to have Roger and Rafa as first on followed by Djokovic vs Andy Roddick with Muzza playing the night match ( he's playing an American too so presumably not unattractive ).

Instead the first 2 matches today are Andy ( yet again ) and Roddick ( following his night match ) with Roger and Rafa ( today's night match ) to follow.

I'd put a guess which is going to be first semi on Saturday  hmm.gif   Maybe Andy will be out of here and not involved.

__________________
RJA


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9639
Date:

Another thing with these early matches is that the attendances have been shockingly bad. I think that playing in front a mostly empty stadium just adds to Andy's lack of motivation for early round matches.

Hopefully there will be a few more people there today since he is playing a Yank.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5679
Date:

Interesting look at the logic . . . good to see someone is thinking these things through! I think that today part of the situation is also his opponent: because he's still in the doubles, Fish has to play twice. That probably made an early start on the singles more likely . . . .

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40755
Date:

Spectator wrote:

Interesting look at the logic . . . good to see someone is thinking these things through! I think that today part of the situation is also his opponent: because he's still in the doubles, Fish has to play twice. That probably made an early start on the singles more likely . . . .




Ah, that I suppose has some logic to having Fish on first.  So I must dismiss that, I prefer conspiracy !!   wink.gif

__________________
1 2 36  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard