Pardon my dimness, but that still doesn't explain why it came about. David Rice = Dr, fair enough, but why the "No"? I can see no logical connection between the Bond villain & David Rice, the Brit tennis player. I'm pretty sure I saw a more detailed explanation posted by you, Steven, on here a while back, but can I hell remember what it was...
I was under the impression that it was "David Rice - Number One". Not sure why.
I thought the explanation previously given for the Dr No nickname was the utterly tedious one that he likes James Bond films. How incredibly imaginative ... NOT!!!
Plus I think I once made the point that it is really quite odd to use someone's nickname when you don't actually know them. Nicknames generally suggest familiarity with the person, which (so far as I am aware) nobody on this board has.
__________________
"Where Ratty leads - the rest soon follow" (Professor Henry Brubaker - The Institute of Studies)
Yes, I must admit i don't find it odd at all that a group such as this closely following the ups and downs of a group of tennis players shoud bestow and commonly use nicknames.for them, even if in the vast majority of cases we have never met them.
Yes, I must admit i don't find it odd at all that a group such as this closely following the ups and downs of a group of tennis players shoud bestow and commonly use nicknames.for them, even if in the vast majority of cases we have never met them.
It's also partly down to the nature of modern language and online communication. Most people want to shorten everything as much as possible.
-- Edited by RJA on Thursday 15th of July 2010 03:30:00 PM
true, but i think for public figures that changes. ok some of GB's tennis players maybe aren't as public as the likes of 'Posh & Becks'.
Oddly though i called Alex 'Boggo' on tennis boards all the time i never call him that face to face (he makes me say 'Sir' )
ROFLMAO
What I find really weird is that people like Roger the Dodger call Alex "Boggo" in official press conferences. Us referring to players by their assumed nicknames is very mild in comparison.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Not sure where tennis players get the idea they can go around calling people idiots from. Perhaps tennis shouldnt be given such a priority over an education if a gentlemen in their 20s hasnt learnt some basic manners.
The players need to be made to understand that the worse they treat the umpires, the lower the standard of umpiring will become, because no-one has to do it.
murray_2k9 wrote:Not sure where tennis players get the idea they can go around calling people idiots from. Perhaps tennis shouldnt be given such a priority over an education if a gentlemen in their 20s hasnt learnt some basic manners.
I can understand why a professional sportsman might be pretty annoyed about people implying he is getting bladdered the night before a match.
Its just harmless banter though, it isnt done with any malice though if I have misread the situation then I apologise.
To me, being a professional means proving yourself through your actions rather than through name calling and petty insults. The women take their fair share of criticism and Ive never seen them acting rudely. The link between professionalism, both on and off court, and success is clear.
-- Edited by murray_2k9 on Thursday 15th of July 2010 01:17:06 PM
I know it is intended as harmless banter but such things can have consequences. Lets just say Sean had a really bad today and put in an absolute stinker of a performance. There would have been a few comments on here implying it was down to him being hungover. Such comments can be picked up on and before you know it rumours are flying round that would paint him in a bad light.
So I agree that calling someone an idiot is not to his credit I can understand why he would be annoyed enough to do so.
Broadly speaking I'd agree with RJA. The initial comments about some of the unusual losses yesterday seemed pretty unfair. It doesn't seem right to suggest, even in jest, that a player has lost because he has been behaving unprofessionally when there is no evidence that such is the case. And I don't really think it's fair to keep bringing up incidents or tendencies that people had in the past, either.
On the other hand, some of the "tweets" aren't exactly helpful.
Incidentally, does anyone else find the suggestions of riotous living in Frinton vaguely ironic? Unless it has changed a great deal from the last time I was there, a less riotous place cannot be imagined.
Well I agree with you to some extent but we all get annoyed. For me thats no excuse but if you accept rudeness in response to annoyance thats your decision, but it isnt something I would ever do. That said, I dont have anything to do with the little spat anyways.