Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Wimbledon Ladies Singles Round 1


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2446
Date:
RE: Wimbledon Ladies Singles Round 1


After falling to 40-0 Katie misses 3 BP chances

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 173
Date:

deuce again COME ON KATIE!

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 173
Date:

4th chance



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2446
Date:

4th opportunity!

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2446
Date:

grrrrrr

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 173
Date:

not taken please Katie don't play like a Brit you can do this

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2446
Date:

4th MP Bondarenko

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2446
Date:

GSM Bondarenko

__________________


Lower Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 173
Date:

GSM Bondarenko good fight Katie just not to be

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18651
Date:

Katie saves 3 more matchpoints, then has 4 breakpoints and finally succumbs

GSM A Bondarenko 6-3 6-7(10) 6-4

Sadly 2 valiant efforts from the two players with little chance on paper for no reward

__________________
Tim


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 307
Date:

Yup ...

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1677
Date:

BBC Interview with Bally

She mentions that she is playing Mixed doubles but not who she's partnering.

-- Edited by RBBOT on Monday 21st of June 2010 08:39:01 PM

__________________


Hall of fame

Status: Offline
Posts: 9477
Date:

First day review:

Bally: Played adequately the first set and a half against an opponent clearly out of sorts who was making several UE. But at 3-2 with a break Bally suddenly started to tighten up and her opponent known for her fighting qualities cut out the majority of her errors leading to Bally put under more and more pressure. I thought Bally would still just about serve it out but she couldn't and the writing was on the wall from that moment on. If this was just an average tournament Bally would have rallied in the final set and fought her way back but due to terminal pressure that Wimby brings for British players she couldn't. Next year under the same circumstances she would be fine but carrying the clear favourites tag she couldn't play her normal relaxed/pumped up style of tennis.

Mel: The less said about this the better although I have to say her opponent was very consistent and played much better than I expected.

Laura: Nothing surprised me here. Played better as the match wore on. Probably played up to the level of her HC final appearance. Top 50 performance when at her best. Seems to be getting stronger and fitter which allowed her to sustain her level of play in the second set when the rallies became longer and more intense. Speed around the court still a huge issue but when it improved in the second set she really put JJ under pressure. Will need to improve that part of her play to become a top 10 player. I still see her levelling out somewhere between the 10 and 30 range assuming she remains as dedicated as she is at the moment. Serve easily the best I've seen it and she can dictate the points using some great angles and power from both her BH/FH side. Needs to improve her slice/defensive play.

Katie: Was this on a televised court ? Court 15 so I assumed not. Was only able to follow it on live score. Appears a much improved performance but as Indy tells us rightly so it is impossible to tell from watching the live score what her level of play was. It appears to be a very plucky performance with the usual inherent weaknesses on serve. Never felt she was going to win but much happier with her performance on the face of it. I wonder though whether she would have been able to have seen out the win if given the opportunity. Her confidence levels in general must be shot to pieces.

__________________


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2279
Date:

I think Katies match can only be a positive. She should surely take confidence from pushing a top player who has won a WTA titles this year to such a tough match, but I guess all will be revealed in the coming months.

Does anyone find it strange that our top women always seem to come in pairs?

First Bally & Anne, both spend a long time at ITF level before maturing late, breaking the top 100 and hitting around about the top 50 mark, including runs to R3 of a slam.

Then Katie & Mel, both break the top 100 briefly before sliding back down through the ranks with what it seems is a total crisis of confidence.

Then Heather & Laura, both winning junior grand slams and showing impressive signs of potential in their early WTA matches.

I wonder who our next pair will be? Elenar Dean/Katy Dunne perhaps?

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2559
Date:

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/182517/Wimbledon-2010-Laura-Robson-needs-to-loosen-up/

Navritolova on robson

__________________

«First  <  16 7 8 9  >  Last»  | Page of 9  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard