i know he's not in favour but if the LTA are trying to sweeten him up for DC this could be a start. they can't guarantee him a wimby one as AETLC have final say. and obviously a Eastbourne WC is a poor trade off as you miss wimby Q.
i think Baker maybe as well.
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
Got to be Ward again. He has never disgraced himself at Queens and performed well the year he qualified as well. He has game on grass because of his serve and movement
The 3 best british performances at Nottingham should get them.
Yeh I agree with this. If the LTA have supported the decision to have play-offs for DC to establish the best form, allowing those who do best the WCs should be a good motivation. I suppose the problem is remaining totally neutral, and fairly determining whether a tight 3 set loss to a player ranked 150 is better than a tight 3 set win against a player ranked 200 etc.