Re Mel's WC, could this have been given to Jade Curtis? Either that or she's withdrawn.
Probably been given to Jade then. I wonder whether the fact that neither Anna or Naomi are on the Aegon 2010 players list is a contributing factor to their non selection I hope not.
Looking at the drawsheet, it appears that the players who were due to receive qualifying WCs, did not need to use them, and they're in by their rankings alone. Presumably, they can use these WCs elsewhere now?
I don't think they can because the qualies draw has already been made so no room there and the main draw will already have enough spots filled from the 4 WCs advertised before and the 20 DAs.
Jade was still playing at Bath today in the final of the U21 Challenge, so maybe she couldn't make it to qualifying sign-in in time and has got a WC instead?
Looking at the drawsheet, it appears that the players who were due to receive qualifying WCs, did not need to use them, and they're in by their rankings alone. Presumably, they can use these WCs elsewhere now?
Having read my own post, I can see that it could be interpreted two ways.
Rather than the tournament using the WCs elsewhere, I was referring to the players, i.e. Hope Johnson, Alex Walker, Ruth Seaborne. If they haven't used one of their allocation of WCs here, I guess they can apply for them at other tournaments in the future.
Oh, I see what you mean. I don't know the answer to but would presume you're right, especially seeing as Sfar is listed as a WC so its not that they just haven't bothered to specify who has one.
Radovic is 14 and listed on ITF as playing for Serbia ... hmm. She got double bagelled by WR 787 in QR1 in Bath last week when playing for Serbia, so maybe they've decided to let us have her?
Oh, I see what you mean. I don't know the answer to but would presume you're right, especially seeing as Sfar is listed as a WC so its not that they just haven't bothered to specify who has one.
I've lost the thread here (Monday mornings), so apologies if I'm going down a blind alley. I think Sfar will have needed a WC because she didn't sign in (perhaps she rang up and said "can't get a flight, not going to make sign-in" and the organiser said "that's OK, you can have a wild card")--I think the others signed in and it turned out after sign-in that they got in (not atypically) on ranking, so didn't need the wild cards. As for whether Mr Martens' system will credit them with an extra wild card, well, you'd need someone who actually knows what they're talking about to answer that, and that's not me.
philwrig wrote:
I would concur with that opinion.
I really have lost the thread. Which opinion?
__________________
This post is fiction. Any resemblance to any person living or dead is purely coincidental.
Radovic is 14 and listed on ITF as playing for Serbia ... hmm. She got double bagelled by WR 787 in QR1 in Bath last week when playing for Serbia, so maybe they've decided to let us have her?
-- Edited by steven on Monday 22nd of March 2010 10:54:43 AM
To be fair, the world no. 787 was Ellen Barry. More than likely, the nationality is in error on the scoreboard anyway.
EDIT: ...though I doubt there would have been a different result against the no. 786 or 788. Looks like Millie's been been here a while, at least some of the time, and possibly under a rather transparent alias, so I shouldn't have pooh-poohed your suggestion on nationality. Actually, I didn't do any pooh-poohing, that's not how it sounded in my head, and if it came out that way, I'm sorry.
FWIW, here's a post about Ilge and Mil(l)ie on wtaworld.
-- Edited by Embittered on Monday 22nd of March 2010 01:26:34 PM
__________________
This post is fiction. Any resemblance to any person living or dead is purely coincidental.