Next up Tipsy, a player who Andy has never actually found that easy. Score is 3-2 to Andy, last match being in the French Open last year when Andy won 7-6 6-3 RET. Tipsy has beaten Andy in Moscow on hard in 2 tight sets in 2008 and at Queens in 3 sets in 2006. Andy's other 2 wins being in St Petersburg on hard in 2 tight sets in 2008 and Metz on hard in 3 sets in 2007.
I quite like watching Tipsy, he has a good spirit to him, and that's a very decent head to head record, but still clearly a match Andy should be winning.
I managed to see most of the match, from the seventh game on. Andy looked really out of sorts and not at all interested at that point. Like a day at the office when he would rather have been somewhere else. He only seemed to start appearing to actually want to win towards the end of the second set.
Some of the tennis in the third set, from both players, was absolutely stunning. But Andy had dropped his serve at the start of the set and just couldn't make up the deficit, breaking Tipsy to get the match back on serve, and then being broken himself to lose - though not with bad serving or silly play at that stage.
If he had played the match from the start with the same level of intensity I'm sure he would have won. And now, I wouldn't be surprised if Tipsy loses tamely in the next round. That's life. If he could play at that level all the time he would be ranked much higher!
Think Andy really still bit rusty after his break and admitted lack of doing very much. Sounds though as if he was playing himself into decent form latterly in the match.
Tipsy does seem to enjoy playing Andy and raises his game. As Madeline said if he could just do it more consistently.
I suppose Andy is allowed to lose an ATP match below Masters level, last did so in Barcelona in April 2008 ( not counting Beijing Olympics in August 2008 ).
Anyway, got a couple more weeks to do more work and tune up his game and he should hopefully be all set for IW.
Bit late, but I meant to comment before on Andy managing to upset a second tournament organiser after the Marseille organiser felt he'd been mucked about a bit before Andy's final late withdrawal.
I must admit I'd already read of Andy's comments before I heard the organisers were so concerned. I did kind of think they might not be happy to hear them. Yes, he is being honest, but he is seemingly getting a lot of money to turn up there and to imply he was just in many ways practicing does noone any good. Better if he had said he was a bit rusty after so many weeks out and hadn't been able to play much due to niggles which in many ways would apparently be true. He just shouldn't have added the stuff that it was more just like a training week and he was trying stuff out.
Like Marselle, I do certainly think the organiser has a good point. Again, like Marseille I very much doubt Andy will be penalised at all. I do hope though that the ATP on occasions take time to remind the top players of their responsibilities.
I am sure other players are similarly guilty, just obviously we are more aware of Andy, and he may not be the worst. I do think though that he's probably quite far from the best re consideration for others.
He really at times needs to consider others and also think what he is saying on occasion, i.e. don't lie but he didn't need to come out with all he did here which may seem to devalue the tournament.
All the top players have a greart life. We need all the tournaments and sponsors we can get, more particularly for the lower ranked players. They do need to sometimes remember ( or be reminded ) of their responsibilities.
Reporters at press conferences have a nasty habit of asking leading questions which can result in the unwary, e.g. Andy, to say things which, surprise surprise, give them something to write about.