The Frenchman, who beat Simone Bolelli in a bit of tussle by 7-6(2) 7-6(3)6-3, should present a stiffer test than Kevin Anderson did, but this match is surely still little more than the next, relatively straightforward, rung on the ladder to the business end of the tournament & the tougher questions that will ask of Andy? The head-to-head stands at 1-0 in Andy's favour, that meeting being in the QF of Rotterdam last year (7-6(2) 4-6 3-0rtd). I'll be surprised if it's not another straight-sets win for him, four at the outside.
There've been some interesting developments overnight. Of immediate interest as far as Andy's quarter is concerned is the fact that Melzer (28) has followed "Ugly Mug" Stepanek (13) out of the first-round exit door, having been beaten 1-6 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 3-6 by one of Gicquel's compatriots, Florent Serra. In the other quarter of the bottom half of the draw, Rainer Schüttler despatched Sam Querrey (25) by 6-3 2-6 6-4 6-3, while the Croatian qualifier, Ivan Dodig, saw off JCF (23) 2-6 1-6 6-4 6-1 6-1 ( quite a comeback from two sets down!), in Fed's quarter & the Colombian, Santiago Giraldo, did for Tommy Robredo (16) in straight sets, 4, 4 & 2 (winning the Hopman Cup clearly didn't do him all that much good! ) in NoDjo's quarter. The highest seed to fall so far, however, is Robin Söderling (8), who was beaten by Marcel Granollers by 7-5 6-2 4-6 4-6 2-6 (another great comeback from the dead!).
One of the commentators, I can't remember whether it was Lloyd or Bailey, quoted Gicquel as saying that the last time they met he had Andy on the ropes until he injured his leg. I thought, I hope Andy has been told about that remark, he will try that bit harder to beat him easily! It was certainly very close last time in Rotterdam, Andy taking the first set on a tiebreak and losing the second, so I wasn't totally comfortable about this match-up, but I needn't have worried.
Philwrig, I think you are trying to usurp my position as Board Pessimist!
I didn't see anything in his form to worry much about. I would have been a lot more worried if he had expended a lot of unneccessary energy playing lights-out tennis when it really wasn't needed. I also thought he was using the opportunity to experiment a bit.
Again, it was a match that Murray was never going to lose unless he had an absolute shocker, so he did enough to get through in straight sets which is what he needs to do after the amount of times he has dropped silly sets in the past.
Not the best performance by Murray but it didn't need to be and he showed enough signs to suggest that if he had to, he could have upped his game.
He's got a good draw for the next couple of rounds as well so if he can win easily without being at his best, he should be fresh for when the meeting with Nadal happens which gives him the best chance of victory.
Watched Andy last night and not his best after the first set. The wind got up a little and the temperature dropped considerably very quickly.
Don't know if that affected the players but they where probably a lot warmer than I was.
Good crowd. I saw a lot more Union jacks during the day than I normally see and of course a good few Scottish flags as there always is at Andy's matches.
Also watched the last 2 sets of the Sorenson match. He was a lot better player than I thought he would be to be fair to the lad. Playing against Isner is not the easiest unless his serve is way off. Too many free points for Isner on his serve for the Irish lad to have a chance really. I was sat close to the legend that is Sonia O'Sullivan which was nice.