Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 2 - Australian Open Qualifying


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2559
Date:
RE: Week 2 - Australian Open Qualifying


shame.

__________________



Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3851
Date:

great effort laura, and 40 points to show for it

__________________

                                                                                                      



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13874
Date:

Brutal encounter last over two hours.

Shame Laura couldn't get the win, but another 40 points in the bag. smile

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

Ah, what a great pity, but at least Laura takes from this qualification a very well deserved 40 ranking points.

It does appear to have been a tremendously gutsy, fighting performance from Laura.

Looking at the statistics, she was actually outscored on points 92 to 78, and had 99 serves as against 71  ( OK, much of that serve difference in one game  eyepopping.gif )  and was still so close to taking it to a final set.

She took 3 out of 7 BP chances, intriguingly each of her breaks immediately followed a Krajicek break, only once at 4 - 5 in the first set failing to break back.  Especially notable of course was her break back after the frustration of eventually being broken in THAT GAME.  Krajicek's BP stats were 4 / 14, so I think pretty successful there if you took out THAT GAME where she got there in the end.

The most amazing statistic to my mind is only 1 Double Fault by Laura ( 4 by Krajicek )  Remember US Open FQR last year when on her own admission she could hardly hold her racquet properly on serving and served 22 DFs, a great portion near the end. Seems to have been one hell of an improvement in mental toughness and composure since then.

Unforced error stats on the face of it are pretty unbelievable to the extent that I probably don't believe them !  These are always a bit in the eye of the beholder, but for posperity on the Aus Open site they read :  Laura  2,  Krajicek  8.  I guess she was at least being extremely consistent anyway.

This from a girl still six days short of her 16th birthday, and I remain full of optimism for the future.

Over the last couple of weeks she has shown real quality, great fight and new levels of composure.

The future looks very good to me    clap.gif

-- Edited by indiana on Friday 15th of January 2010 02:06:46 AM

__________________


Masters Series Champion

Status: Offline
Posts: 3851
Date:

lol at the UE stat, she had 2 UE after the first two games, so don't know how they come up with these stats at all

__________________

                                                                                                      



Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2559
Date:

lol. Take the unforced error count with a pinch of salt.
Anyway, I wasn't too displeased with the loss because the stats seem to suggest Laura played well but was just beaten by the better player on the day.
73% first serves and only 1 df.
I don't know whether she was taking something off her first serve (which may account for a relatively low 1st serve win %) but that is consistant stuff.

-- Edited by Maza1987 on Friday 15th of January 2010 02:06:51 AM

__________________



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

Mm, they were apparently still counting unforced errors still in the second set.

Set counts are :   Set One :  Laura  2,  Krajicek 2,   Set 2 :  Laura 0, Krajicek 6

So if she did indeed have the 2 after two games, that's errr quite a performance thereafter.

I'm afriad re UEs there are lies, damned lies and statistics. 

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

deuce on Cav's opening service game...

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

and not the best start in the world, *1-0 to Wickmayer.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

Wickmayer holds to love in no time at all, 2-0.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

These Grand Slam statistics are always a tad dubious, apparently not a single winner or UE yet by either player in the first 3 games.

Unfortunately Cav is broken yet again, this time to 30 having led 30-15

*3-0 Wickmayer

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

4-0 in 13 mins, Cav having won just 6 points so far. cry

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

At least Cav saved one break point this time, but Wickmayer takes the 2nd to go up 5-0

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2432
Date:

First set Wickmayer 6-0 in 20 minutes.  At least it can't get any worse.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:

Let's count points.   25 points to 10.    Sounds better  smile

Edit :  Oh, and there must have been a deuce in there or it would have been 24 points to Wickmayer.

-- Edited by indiana on Friday 15th of January 2010 02:46:26 AM

__________________
«First  <  114 15 16 17 18  >  Last»  | Page of 18  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard