Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 40 - ITF ($100K+H) - Tokyo, Japan


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 40760
Date:
RE: Week 40 - ITF ($100K+H) - Tokyo, Japan


Peter too wrote:

philwrig wrote:

The WTA tends to reward first round victories more than they should particularly evident in the qualifying rounds of grand slams.




I suspect this simply shows that women tend to be more realistic than the men about their own abilities and which tournaments will provide the best chance of collecting ranking points. After all if a girl won 16 $25K events she would be ranked at about 80.

The optimum strategy is probably to only enter tournaments that you have a good chance of winning.



Don't really follow that very much, Peter, but maybe it's just me  smile

a) Why the WTA system is / should be related to women's thinking ?

b)  Anyway, re the optimum strategy to enter tournaments they only have a good chance of winning  confuse.gif  when what we have been generally been saying is that winners get less credit in the women's side rather than the men's and early losers get more credit.

To me on the face of it, there is more advantage on the women's side in entering a bit higher class tournament and winning one or 2 rounds relative to winning a lower tournament. 

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18077
Date:

What I am suggesting is that the WTA have had to increase the points available for winning early rounds in higher level tournaments because otherwise women would not enter them. Women would often prefer instead to enter lower ranked tournaments where they would be seeded and stood a very good chance of collecting winners points.

If I was a professional player ranked around 350-100 I would enter big tournaments for the experience of rubbing shoulders with the stars but $25Ks would be my bread and butter.

At present you win 50 points for winning a $25K final, a $50K SF, a $75K QF or two rounds of a Grand Slam Qualifier. A 200 ranked player would I suspect be less likely to meet a someone they couldn't beat in the $25K than in any of the others.

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

Katie is on the scoreboard

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

Katie is first

1-0*

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

2-1* double break there

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

4-1* manages to hold this time.

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

*5-1 Katie well on top now, breaks to love

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

6-1 1-1*

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

6-1 3-1* (Katie broke from 40-15 down)

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

6-1 *3-2


__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

6-1 3-6 *3-1 sorry I had to leave

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

6-1 3-6 3-2* I need to leave again, good luck katie

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2564
Date:

Katie won 6-1, 3-6, 6-3

-- Edited by Shhh on Friday 9th of October 2009 06:49:12 AM

__________________

 Its really not as bad as they say :)



County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

Ahh good, I was a bit worried in the middle!

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 931
Date:

SF: OBRIEN, Katie (GBR) 3 98 v SAVCHUK, Olga (UKR) 180



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard