One query. I take it I am correct in thinking that the table generally shows the ranking of the opponents at a specific date that the original post was updated rather than their rankings at the time of the relevant matches ?
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 4th of July 2011 08:16:51 PM
One query. I take it I am correct in thinking that the table generally shows the ranking of the opponents at a specific date that the original post was updated rather than their rankings at the time of the relevant matches ?
-- Edited by indiana on Monday 4th of July 2011 08:16:51 PM
HELLO !! Having looked at 2 or 3, is it actually the case that in spite of the wording : "based upon current rankings in the ATP rankings" suggesting that initially all the rankings came from rankings all at a specific date, they are in fact in all cases the rankings of the players at the date they were beaten, which I think is what's best.
Was just trying to clarify, and I think it's just the way I was initailly reading the wording.
So, all are rankings at the date these players were beaten ?
I think you should put the ones I put on the previous page of this thread. Maybe not the doubles guys, but Gabb, N. Skupski, Burton, Short, etc. should go on there.
James Marsalek rises a massive 11 places to 14th with his win over Simone Vagnozzi (166) replacing his previous best of Brezac (269) in Great Britain F12 earlier this year.