The match is scheduled second on court 4, after Melzer v Becker.
H2H Elena (Bally) Baltacha v Kirsten (Flipper) Flipkens
2-0
Bally won 6-1 6-1 in Jersey (2005) Bally won 6-3 6-3 in Torhout (2008)
Both matches were indoors, with Bally going on to win the tournament. However Flipper is much higher ranked now (she was coming back from long-term injury in 2008), so should provide stronger opposition than before.
Perhaps they've put her on Court 4 (the old Court 3?) because they're both ranked outside the top 100. IT still seems pretty poor to me, and after Tuesday's performance they can hardly claim they're trying to save her from show court nerves!
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Looking at TBE's rankings Bally could sneak a top 100 spot with a win here if Vania King loses vs. Pennetta although it looks more possible than probable with the 100K in Cuneo next week.
Bally is unfortunately on the wrong half of the draw in terms of the name value players in the womens event.
On her half of the draw are Safina, Mauresmo, Wozniacki, Kuznetsova, Venus, Ivanovic and Jankovic, so for her to manage to push most of them out of a show court would be a surprise.
Expected her to be on a better court than court 4 though...maybe not centre or one, but court two or court three for sure.
But then this is Wimbledon...the only one of the slams that goes out of its way to stop it's players fro being on a show court.
The French always put their players on Chatrier/Lenglen if they can. The US are known for having an OOP that is advantageous towards its own players. And the Aussie Open seems to put Aussies in night matches, however unknown they may be, must to the disgust of the BBC who then has to televise a match involving two "no-name" players.