steven wrote:No, it doesn't work like that, there are only playoffs between promotion and relegation contenders for the World Group in DC, if we lose to Poland we go straight down. (for the women, playoffs exist for both WG I and WG II)
Why in 06 did we play three matches in EA Group 1? (l. Serbia, l. Israel, b. Ukraine)
Without checking the draw for that year, I'd suspect it was because instead of drawing the bye like we did this year in round 1, we drew Serbia instead.
This year South Africa and Macedonia were the teams who didn't get a bye in round 1, and the winner of that tie, South Africa, will play Belarus in May to determine who gets promoted, while I presume the loser will face Macedonia in July, with the loser facing Slovak Republic in the relegation play-off in September.
But as there isn't always an even number of teams in the group because it depends on who wins the world group play-off matches, there's always the likelyhood that some teams will have to play twice, while others only once.
In 2006, we did get a bye in R1 and played Serbia in R2. However, whereas the Ukraine this year had also had a bye in R1, Serbia had beaten Israel in R1 in 2006. Having lost to Serbia as well, we then had to play Israel, with the loser going into the final relegation playoff against the Ukraine, which in that case we won.
It's a bit clearer if you look at http://www.daviscup.com/results/ea1.asp and pick the year you're interested in from the dropdown. Note that once you have won a tie, there is no way you can have to play in the losers bracket, so if we had beaten Serbia in 2006, Israel would have gone straight to the final relegation playoff against the Ukraine, Serbia wouldn't have had to play them again.
Similarly this year, since South Africa beat Macedonia in R1 and in R2 will play Belarus (who had a bye in R1), if Belarus beat South Africa, Macedonia will go straight down to a final relegation playoff against Slovakia (because South Africa, having already won a tie this year, won't have to play Macedonia again), but if South Africa beat Belarus, Belarus (who then won't have won a tie this year yet) will play Macedonia in July with Slovakia facing the loser of that tie.
All this kind of makes sense, but perhaps it's not that surprising that a lot of people don't really understand how DC works.
The complications here result from the fact that there are always some R1 byes in EA Group I because, as FD says, the number of teams in EA Group I depends on how many European teams are in the World Group that year.
Btw I've just noticed that in Australia's Asia Oceania Group I tie with Thailand, Danai Udomchoke beat both Brydan Klein and Lleyton Hewitt (!) and the Aussie hero of the tie was none other than the Gooch, teaming up with Carsten Ball to beat the Rati Thais in the doubles and then beating smellycat (Kittiphong Wachiramanowong) in the 5th rubber.
-- Edited by steven at 01:15, 2009-03-12
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
Given that Dan Cox beat Frederik Sletting-Johnsen and Norway's highest-ranked player at 662 is Stian Boretti, that's a tie we might even be able to win without Muzza.
However, Norway are two levels down from GB at the moment, so they'd need to finish in the top two out of Andorra, Bosnia/Herzegovina, Morocco, Namibia, Nigeria, Norway, San Marino & Tunisia in Tunis next month to be in the same group as us even if we lost to Poland.
GB have played Norway twice, in 1948 and 1953, both in Norway on clay and GB won 4-1 and 5-0.
Btw in the new DC rankings, GB have dropped from 24th to 26th (overtaken by Italy, who vie with us for having the most shocking DC record of any major country, and Japan), the Ukraine are up 13 places to 28th, Poland are down 3 to 39th and Norway are 69th.
-- Edited by steven at 10:42, 2009-03-12
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
I think we have to bear in mind the opposition here. Poland, and I mean no disrespect, are hardly a huge draw. On the other hand there are a lot of Polish people working and living in the UK.
Aberdeen EEC. Hoested 2 'Aberdeen Cups' so is proven as a tennis venue. A long shot and not realistic.
Birmingham NIA / NEC. Both venues available at the moment. Front runner ?
Braehead Arena. Available. Going for third time lucky...maybe not ?
Wimbledon Court 1 or 2. Available but are they to big for a tie v Poland ?
MEN Arena Manchester. Might be to big but its available. Wouldnt mind going here !
I'd be surprised if they hold the tie in Scotland, simply for the fact it would be unlikely to have two in a row there - and if Murray doesn't play as I'd expect him not to, the attraction of Scotland is lost.
Birmingham would be the favourite at the moment as I'm sure it's been a while since they had a tie, but it depends on the surface that we choose to hold the tie on - if it's on grass, then I think they may go for Eastbourne as I'd say that Wimbledon may be too large, but indoors, I'd expect Birmingham to get the tie.
(and nothing wrong with choosing Eastbourne - I'll enjoy the 15 minute walk to the stadium...)
Jonny as second singles and Ken Skupski with RH in the doubles would bring a real local flavour to the tie!
-- Edited by James on Wednesday 6th of May 2009 11:14:00 AM lol i knew there was another scouse boy but i forgot who it was...Skuppers spent too long in US i now think of him as a local Louisana boy lol
-- Edited by The Knight on Wednesday 6th of May 2009 11:16:17 AM