It's also not entirely certain that the LTA should speak about "focusing on" Liam Broady. My impression is that he has managed to succeed quite independently. But having said that, is it not possible that they are doing at least some things right? There's been a lot of good stuff happening at the junior level recently -- surely more than one can attribute simply to random distribution of talent? (NB: Open invitation to statisticians to dispute . . . .)
-- Edited by Spectator on Thursday 24th of February 2011 02:37:25 PM
I am sure they are ( must be ! ) doing some things right but it is a pity that that is in amoingst all the other ( censor time coming again ) bull**** they come out with.
Gee, maybe they are even doing quite a lot right but they present themselves so badly by trying to present themselves so well.
-- Edited by indiana on Thursday 24th of February 2011 02:46:48 PM
I'm not trying to defend the LTA, but Indy if you were in charge would you be entirely honest and be saying I am doing a crap job, fire me now, I am completely clueless etc., etc.,. No you wouldn't so he is just trying to defend his record which is just about impossible.
I'm not trying to defend the LTA, but Indy if you were in charge would you be entirely honest and be saying I am doing a crap job, fire me now, I am completely clueless etc., etc.,. No you wouldn't so he is just trying to defend his record which is just about impossible.
Of course I wouldn't say that Phil. But the amount of laughable contradictory crap that come sout of that guy is beyond a joke.
I'm sure we'd all try and hang on to our jobs if we were i the same situation, but that still doesn't stop us from complaining about it from the outside. Who actually has the power to sack Draper though?
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
Interesting paragraph on Draper in OEM's report in today's Times:
"You would think that a victory - any victory - would be reason enough for Roger Draper, the LTA chief executive, to share his thoughts with those other than the suits in the presidential suite. He is, after all, paid around £400,000 to run the sport, but he chose to go mute on us yesterday. It may be because he is worried we would ask him why he dismissed the members of this weekend's team as "a generation we always knew we would to skip", when he came into office five crushingly ineffective years ago. (my italics)
Is Draper the most hated executive in professional sport ? I often find with the media that if people in sports are on good terms with them then the articles written about them are more positively expressed. Here is clear evidence of that in reverse, Draper and the media pack are on such poor terms that when any articles are written about the LTA they stick the knife in a bit deeper. Articles written about KP in cricket are also similarly expressed due to his poor relations with the press. On the flipside in Football I find that articles written about Harry Redknapp are much more positive than they should be due to the love felt for the Spurs boss by the media core. Similarly now Kenny Dalglish is getting alot of love now for the same reason. The media are sometimes not as objective as they should be. Draper has had an unsuccesful tenure in alot of respects but reading all the reports in the media this weekend would make you think that he was by the far the worst head of the LTA we have ever had. Unless my memory is fading I can't remember any head of the LTA who has had a sucessful tenure.
I am afraid I am unable to rush to the support of the Dodger here, since Phil so recently decided that I was distictly unsuitable to be the devil, I mean Dodger's PR guy
I just don't know how Phil came to that conclusion
I'm not supporting him, I'm just saying the criticism is overdone. Is it not true that the womens side has improved markedly since he became head of the LTA ? Is it not true that we have the best crop of young juniors we have ever had ? Yes the senior mens side is in a shocking state rankings wise and it was very poor to say that we always knew we were going to have skip a generation. But overall I don't think it is 100% doom and gloom, which is the way it is being portrayed by the press.
I'm not supporting him, I'm just saying the criticism is overdone. Is it not true that the womens side has improved markedly since he became head of the LTA ? Is it not true that we have the best crop of young juniors we have ever had ? Yes the senior mens side is in a shocking state rankings wise and it was very poor to say that we always knew we were going to have skip a generation. But overall I don't think it is 100% doom and gloom, which is the way it is being portrayed by the press.
I'm inclined to agree. There are still loads of things that are wrong, but if I remember right, previous LTA chief execs have been even more ineffectual - or at least that's what the media implied at the time.
The media need to balance their articles (and encourage better behaviour in the LTA) by acknowledging improvements as well as criticising all the failures (like we do, I would claim!), or not be surprised if the powers that be can't be bothered to talk to them any more.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
I agree 100% steven . Everytime I read a tweet from Neil Harman about the LTA I am a little saddened in its onesided nature ( as I am a big fan of OEM) it almost seems like a personal attack. We need to work together to bring the best out of our tennis. It can't help when our players read all these negative stories about the state of British tennis. We are all working towards the same goal, so please British media, yes don't ignore all the negative stuff but also don't forget to report on the good news as well.
I am afraid I am unable to rush to the support of the Dodger here, since Phil so recently decided that I was distictly unsuitable to be the devil, I mean Dodger's PR guy
I just don't know how Phil came to that conclusion
For clarification, re the "don't know how Phil came to that conclusion" bit I was actually kinda jokingly ( in my mind ) just meaning conclusion that I wouldn't be a suitable PR guy for Dodger ( I admit I am not his biggest supporter ). Maybe a wink would have been clearer than a hmm.
I was not there challenging Phil's previous post and I'm sorry if I left it open to that interpretation and Phil then felt the need to say more.
-- Edited by indiana on Tuesday 8th of March 2011 04:26:24 PM
No doubt he has a point to some extent, but I wish he'd take this up constructively with the players concerned instead of putting the boot in through the media.
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!