St. Petersburg 1 Murray, Andy GBR 4 2 Davydenko, Nikolay RUS 6 3 Verdasco, Fernando ESP 15 4 Youzhny, Mikhail RUS 22 5 Cilic, Marin CRO 23 6 Tursunov, Dmitry RUS 26 7 Ancic, Mario CRO 31 8 Schuettler, Rainer GER 35 9 Safin, Marat RUS 39 10 Tipsarevic, Janko SRB 43 11 Gulbis, Ernests LAT 48 12 Hanescu, Victor ROU 50 13 Garcia-Lopez, Guillermo ESP 64 14 Troicki, Viktor SRB 66 15 Rochus, Olivier BEL 68 16 Serra, Florent FRA 69 17 Hrbaty, Dominik SVK @70 18 Navarro, Ivan ESP 71 19 Chardy, Jeremy FRA 73 20 Starace, Potito ITA 74 21 Kunitsyn, Igor RUS 76 22 Johansson, Thomas SWE 77 OUT 23 Guccione, Chris AUS 80 24 (SE) 25 (SE) 26 (Q) 27 (Q) 28 (Q) 29 (Q) 30 (WC) Lejnieks, Karlis LAT 31 (WC) Kudryavtsev, Alexandre RUS 32 (WC) Elgin, Mikhail RUS
Alternates 1. Korolev, Evgeny RUS 82 IN 2. Stakhovsky, Sergiy UKR 85 IN 3. Gremelmayr, Denis GER 87 OUT 4. Minar, Ivo CZE 89 OUT 5. Volandri, Filippo ITA 91 IN 6. Vliegen, Kristof BEL 93 7. Andujar, Pablo ESP 94 8. Gabashvili, Teimuraz RUS 97 9. Levine, Jesse USA 98 OUT 10. Zverev, Mischa GER 99 11. Kendrick, Robert USA 100 OUT 12. Becker, Benjamin GER 102 13. Anderson, Kevin RSA 103 14. Rochus, Christophe BEL 106
I'm wondering just how bothered he will be about defending his title here, when he has won/been runner-up in Madrid and has Paris next week. I'd like him to win but won't cry if he doesn't.
Just for the record, Andy is also playing doubles here with Delgo. They've drawn the fourth seeds, Booty & Frantisek Cermak, in the first round...! Not exactly unwinnable, I'd have thought!
Until I saw that Andy was playing doubles here, I was expecting him to withdraw due to fatigue on Monday (I don't think he can withdraw from this event while he is playing in Madrid), but the fact he's playing doubles maybe suggests he is actually going to play the event.
Wouldn't surprise me at all if he lost early though, either being outplayed by Troicki/Gulbis/Ancic, or tanked a match to save energy for Paris and Shanghai
Yeah, I think he'll be dog tired, and perhaps make it through R1, but be done by Gulbis, who standardly takes sets off serious players (e.g. Nadal-and Andy at Queens). I just can't see him going deep after this week's efforts.
I was only saying a couple of days ago that there seems to be so much strength in depth in the top 50 at the moment that you just don't seem to get many easy draws. I think this just highlights it. In a week where there is 3 ATP events on to get a draw like this is pretty tough going.
I suppose one funny aspect is that 6 months ago we'd have all been worriedly updating spreadsheets with Murray defending 250 points hoping he didn't drop too far. Now it's not a case of not caring but my main thought is hope he does ok but mainly is fresh for Paris. I mean whats a measly 250 points to Andy?
After years of defending Andy against the haters on the old BBC boards and MTF, how nice to just sit back smugly and think to them. (At least to the few remaining on MTF, many have changed their minds, and I very rarely go to the new 606 boards as I don't like the format)
Yes, as recently as his Indianapolis zero penalty it being discussied in some depth the effects that having to count "0" as his 5th optional might have on his rankings.
Well, more by luck than judgement it initially never even cost him a single ranking place, and now, huh who cares about optionals, Andy deals in the big stuff
I remember Steven ( I think it was ) preparing a table earlier in the year showing amongst the top 30 what a low % of points total Andy had made up of complulsories, and how % wise he was reliant more on optionals.
That was before the last 5 : Wimbledon - Quarters Canada Masters - Semis Cincinnati Masters - Winner US Open - Finalsit Madrid Masters - Winner / Finalist
How that will now have changed. In fact if he gets knocked out early of St.Petersburg and Doha ( or wherever he plays before the Aussie Open ) and then does well at the Aussie Open, it will really have totally switched round even more than it has already.
Points in mandatories since Wimbledon (i.e. Canada, Cincy, USO, Madrid):
1775 Muzza (even if he loses today) 1400 Rafa 1305 Fed (despite the US Open win) 1050 Nole < 500 The rest (there may be someone else who has scored more than 500 points in these events, but all the possibilities I could think of, e.g. Duck, Simon, JMDP, turned out not to have)
As someone who made the point about how much Andy was relying on points from optionals compared to the other top players just a few months ago (which at the time was a very valid point), I find this an amazing transformation!
If you add in the Olympics, the other event all of the big four played at, the table becomes:
1800 Rafa 1780 Muzza (but 1930 if he wins today) 1405 Fed (despite the US Open win) 1255 Nole
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
1925 Muzza (1930 including the Olympics so Andy is now top even taking into account that disaster!) 1400 Rafa (1800 including the Olympics) 1305 Fed (1405 including the Olympics) 1050 Nole (1255 including the Olympics)
__________________
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!
After years of defending Andy against the haters on the old BBC boards and MTF, how nice to just sit back smugly and think to them. (At least to the few remaining on MTF, many have changed their minds, and I very rarely go to the new 606 boards as I don't like the format)
I agree about the BBC 606 boards ( although to be fair I gave up in total frustration a while ago ). The old BBC format was so much better even allowing for the trolls, which I understand the new format was partly to get rid of. No, they just got rid of thousands of decent posters. It appears to be more a few managers' fantasies about how it should operate and look like as against the wishes of true sports fans.
When I was still around there, new managers seemed to take it in turns to post, saying they would consider and answer queries about the format, then would dissappear after a few weeks after being totally unable to reassure folk regarding decent points and queries. Apart from it's a new format, just give it a chance.
I believe I saw somewhere that the people in charge of the 606 fiasco are related to the folk in charge of Ceefax interactivity for sport. i.e. don't take any texts or emails any more, just take snailmail and seem to have one new letter about every 2 weeks ( seriously, look at page 359, it's pathetic ! ). ITV teletext seems to be managing to live with various pages of folk's texts and emails.
Sorry, I'd kind of forgotten about the 606 boards, haven't had a rant about them for ages