For what it's worth, I agree with Steven - I think 'real' photographs would work better. On the other hand, I agree with Count's spelling (has anyone ever said that before?!!) - 'effected' rather than 'affected' here - unless, of course, Steven is speaking tongue in cheek?
THEY R REAL PHOTOS ! Read above ! They r compressed gifs max 256 colours.
For what it's worth, I agree with Steven - I think 'real' photographs would work better. On the other hand, I agree with Count's spelling (has anyone ever said that before?!!) - 'effected' rather than 'affected' here - unless, of course, Steven is speaking tongue in cheek?
THEY R REAL PHOTOS ! Read above ! They r compressed gifs max 256 colours.
Sorry, Drew, didn't mean to offend! I understand that they're real photos, that's why I used inverted commas round my word 'real'. What I was trying to convey, albeit unsuccessfully, was that my preference would be for 'straightforward' photos such as those of Jamie and Andy in the Olympics banner, rather than the stylised ones in the prototype of Alex' banner. I do realise, though, that it's nothing to do with me, but a matter between you and the Count - I was just offering my thoughts.