I understand that he's probably not eligible for the SE places. If none of the SE places are taken, does that mean they'll start taking players from the alternative list? If that's the case, does it mean just one player has to drop out and then he's in to the main draw?
Or have I got it all wrong? :)
I'll be a nice pay cheque for him, maybe that might allow him to travel a little.
Would it be best to stick to Futures for a little while, or try his hand at Challenger qualifiers?
Well done to Dan Evans. The best answer to critics.
It seems to me like the LTA need to employ sports psychologists to get the most from the junior players. The juniors all compete much more intensely when they have been banned, showing their true class.
A really good psychologist would get that mentality out of them without having to ban them. Sometimes it is the difference between talent, and champion - the desire.
Well done to Evans on winning the title, although it's a shame Flanagan retired in the final, and hope there's nothing wrong with him.
Think Evans should stick to futures for a while to build up the points and get towards 600 in the rankings first, as that would give him a chance of sneaking a seeding in them, while if he's playing at this level, he may as well win futures titles.
Looks like the suspension gave him the kicking he needed and he's finally got his act together, so hopefully it will continue (and he sneaks into the main draw in Cumberland to give himself a rest)
Flanagan cited tendonitis in his wrist as he retired.
I don't think he'll play next week as it hadn't noticeably affected his play in the final, although I think he might have aggravated it digging out a drop shot in the middle of the second set.
In my opinion Evans had taken the upper hand and worn Flan down and the break in the third set made Faln give up hope.
Evans was visibly disappointed to have won by retirement but when he looks back at the last two weeks and sees how many matches he's won I think he'll take a lot of confidence.
In the first set it was pretty even until Flan eased into a higher gear, smoking the returns and the passing shots, hitting the lines and making tennis look effortless. Like we all know he can.
Dan was getting pretty frustrated and orchestrated an argument with the umpire to channel it out. I tihnk this helped to focus him and his level upped in set two. He began to find cheap points on serve slicing out the the Flanagan forehand, and having practised his own forehand after nearly every point in Set 1 he started to find range with that.
Flan still looked like he might have another gear but Dan began to just stick to him not giving him anything for free and eventaully broke to a loud roar. Sadly, he then went to pieces on serve and slipped straight to 0-40 with three ue's before being broken straight back to 15.
A lesser player may have crumbled at this point and Faln was favourite to wrap it up in 2.
Two service holds followed and then another monster game with lots of deuce points, rallies getting longer and Evans forehand beginning to wear Flan down. Dan showed great athleticism and a good brain for constructing points, chipping and charging on Flan's second serve and ghosting into net for flashy backhand smashes and clinical deep volleys on a few occassions.
On the break points Flan was kicking his serve short and high to Dan's shoulder level (Dan is not the tallest!) which saved him a few, but Dan showed his ability to learn on the court and eventually forced the erros out of Flan in the rallies to break again for 5-3.
Dan served out the set without much worry and it was GAME ON!
The first game of the third set served by Flan was another long one and Dan kept up the initiative, moving Flan around and digging out double handed defensive shots to stay in the rallies and forcing FLan to try sometihng more.
Eventually Dan broke, and at the changeoer Flan just gave up. The trainer was called to make it official but it was an anti-climax.
The presentation took place on court within 3 minutes and both players took their leave.
Dan did seem disappointed to have won his first Futures title by retirement but I'm sure he will look back on the week with fondness and can rest assured he played well enough to win. I make that 13 wins in the last 14 singles matches for Evans and while he may be a little tired, he is young and there is absolutely no substitute for winning. I hope his form continues in Cumberland.
I was impressed with the Wrexham set up as well. What a pity the challenger was dropped. I hope it comes back next year.
Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive.... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience
Thanks for the scores and reports, J'lad and Steven.
Typical that newspapers report when someone gets suspended, but not when they do well. Winning a Futures by the age of 18 and 2 is a remarkable achievement, even by international standards.
He may be suspended by them but surelt the LTA can give Evo more than this sentence in an article about Hutchins CHallenger win.
"At the $10,000 event in Wrexham, 18 year-old Dan Evans won his first career singles title beating Ian Flanagan 4-6 6-3 1-0 (retired) in the final. However, Flanagan bounced back to win the doubles title with David Brewer after edging past Kyle Brassington and Matthew Brooklyn 7-6(7) 6-3 in the final."
Plus they should know that FLanagan did not "bounce back" in the doubles final but won it a full 24 hours before wimping out of the singles final only to turn up to play in Cumberland.
ian flanagan only 3/4 years ago beat philipouses and hanescu at queens, and they werent flukes he played well/ i carnt get my head round the fact that he as struggled to get inside the top 500. he as struggled at future level until last week.any one got an idea why this his. well done to young evans though,. wat a prospect,