Match #1: Michelle Larcher De Brito (POR) vs. Abigail Spears (USA) Match #2: Gianluca Naso (ITA) vs. Hugo Armando (USA) Match #3: Michael Yani (USA) vs.Tomas Zib (CZE) Match #4: Katie O'Brien (GBR) vs. Alexa Glatch (USA) Match #5: Stephanie Dubois (CAN) vs. Shuai Zhang (CHN)
Although to be fair, he is slightly overranked because he plays more tournaments than most players in this world.
But the inflation is probably no more than 5-10%.
Dont really agree with this it seems to be the same thinking that Akhen was using, my thoughts are : he is fit enough and hungry enough to play as often as he does and as such deserves to be ranked where he is, that makes a better tennis pro (though not a better player) than someone slightly better who plays 20 events a year and his ranking would reflect that.
Also dont agree with CZ's assertion that draws make a big difference, of course they do in the short term but in the long term everyone gets a run of good ones and a run of bad ones, and we all believe our favourite's get all the bad ones and probably when you look at it they all get pretty much the same as the others.
That's a record of 5-6, with three of the losses coming against Spadea, Udomchoke and Dancevic on grass. Plus he didn't get thumped in any of the matches barring the one where he played Dancevic - hardly shameful as Dancevic is top 50 on grass.
If that's the record of the 500 at best player, I don't know what to say!
Thats completely right, i am aware of what slabba is capable of, i never said he was sh*te. We all know that a coin has two sides! so lets now flip it over and look at that shiny other side
This is his record against players outside the worlds top 450 since May (in other words 3 months)
KJ Hippensteel lost 4-6 3-6 Tsung-Hua Yang lost 6-2 5-7 6-3 Pierrick Ysern lost 6-7 3-6 Nathan Thompson lost 3-6 4-6
That reads.........
Played 4 lost 4
I really don't want it to sound as if im not a fan of Slabba but i feel i need to justify my earlier comments, if maybe abit harsh.
Both Hip and Yang are way better than their ranking.
If Fed gets injured tomorrow (may it never happen) and makes a comeback after a year and Goodall loses to him, should we say that Goodall sucks as he lost to an unranked player?
Or will it be a huge shock if Coxy or Evo plays a guy ranked 500 and wins the match
Other losses are bad, I know, but off days are always there.
Yang is a junior, so better than the ranking (but he served for the match, so probably choked that away)
Hippensteel is better than his ranking, but he's not a top 300 player, so it's a match that Slabba should be winning, given he's ranked in the top 300.
And this loss for Goodall isn't that good at all... I wasn't sure whether he'd win, but 4 and 2 to Hartfield, who's pretty much a clay-courter who doesn't win hard court matches (ignore the Haas win as it was Haas's first match for 4/5 months) is a poor loss (but now he has a break point, so isn't out of it just yet)