Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 20 - Challenger (€85,000+H) - Marrakech, Morocco


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34418
Date:
RE: Week 20 - Challenger (€85,000+H) - Marrakech, Morocco


Haven't you noticed that doubles threads often get hi-jacked like this? It's not a conspiracy though, honest! smile.gif

__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



Admin:Moderator + All Time Great + britishtennis.net correspondant

Status: Offline
Posts: 11280
Date:

steven wrote:

Haven't you noticed that doubles threads often get hi-jacked like this? It's not a conspiracy though, honest! smile.gif




Really ?

I must get more involved in this raket !



-- Edited by Drew at 13:06, 2008-05-13

__________________

BTnet logo



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11934
Date:

andyjmr wrote:

 

Sheddie wrote:

*...." 



 Can you shed any light on this one Count?

 

 



well i think the racquet question has been solved, but not what appears to be confusing me with the shed! how could you, a man of my obivous high standing & calibre confused with the shed bleh

biggrin

 



__________________

 

Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.


www.alexbogdanovic.com



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57731
Date:

steven wrote:

Haven't you noticed that doubles threads often get hi-jacked like this? It's not a conspiracy though, honest! smile.gif



Oh really?  disbelief.gif



__________________


Admin: Moderator+Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 7255
Date:

I've always had difficultly spelling tennis racket/racquet. I hadn't realised it was becuase no one can decide which is the correct version.

So, I thought I'd find the definitive answer and look it up in the OED (at this point it should perhaps be mentioned that I'm in the midst of finals and any distraction is a welcome one). According to that source, 'Racket' is the correct spelling, in reference to: "A bat used in the games of rackets, tennis, etc., consisting of a network of cord or catgut stretched across a somewhat elliptical frame formed of a bent strip of wood, metal, etc., to the base of which a handle is attached."

That would suggest that Racquet is the American version of the word. smile.gif

Back to the tennis, do we yet know Aucks and Delgy's opponents in the second round?

-- Edited by imoen at 17:42, 2008-05-13

__________________

To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty


Oscar Wilde



Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1771
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

Another win for our doubles boys:  6-4 3-6 [10-8] to Aucks & Delgo! smile thumbsup.gif




Good win there for the A & D duo. teamwork.gif Don't know who they will play next but it'll be tomorrow, last match on court 1.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57731
Date:

helki wrote:

Stircrazy wrote:

Another win for our doubles boys:  6-4 3-6 [10-8] to Aucks & Delgo! smile thumbsup.gif




Good win there for the A & D duo. teamwork.gif Don't know who they will play next but it'll be tomorrow, last match on court 1.



The fourth seeds, Rubén Ramírez Hidalgo & Bruno Soares (ESP/BRA)!  I thought at one point it was going to be Gabashvili & Menéndez, as they were leading 8-4 in the MTB, but the next time I checked, they'd turned it round! omg.gif



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13874
Date:

According to the draw on ATP and the OOP, it was Gabashvile and Menendez.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57731
Date:

wolf wrote:

According to the draw on ATP and the OOP, it was Gabashvile and Menendez.



hmm  I've found it a complete & utter waste of time to check the ATP site so far this week, as the doubles draw sheet has always been blank.  Somebody must finally have got his/her @rse in gear in Marrakech & passed on the data! disbelief.gif  The result I quoted earlier was as reported on the tournament site.  Needless to say, that has now been been amended & Aucks & Delgo will indeed be playing Teimuraz Gabashvili & Adrián Menéndez (RUS/ESP) in tomorrow's QF.



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1771
Date:

wolf wrote:

According to the draw on ATP and the OOP, it was Gabashvile and Menendez.



Who they duly saw off 6-4 6-4. smile teamwork.gif They will play Fornell and Ouahabi (ESP/MAR) in the SF. F and O beat the top seeds Levinsky and Skoch in the QF, so are not to be underestimated but I have faith. pray.gif


-- Edited by helki at 20:19, 2008-05-14

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57731
Date:

helki wrote:

wolf wrote:

According to the draw on ATP and the OOP, it was Gabashvile and Menendez.



Who they duly saw off 6-4 6-4. smile teamwork.gif They will play Fornell and Ouahabi (ESP/MAR) in the SF. F and O beat the top seeds Levinsky and Skoch in the QF, so are not to be underestimated but I have faith. pray.gif


You win some, you lose some! wink  At least one of our pairs won yesterday!  Good on Aucks & Delgo! clap.gif  I have faith, too! please.gif



__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1771
Date:

Wonder why Aucks and Delgo ain't played yet? shocked.gif

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57731
Date:

helki wrote:

Wonder why Aucks and Delgo ain't played yet? shocked.gif



Been trying to work that one out myself, especially as the result of the other doubles SF, scheduled to be played after theirs, in which Gil & Margea (POR/ROU) took on the third seeds, Brunstrom & Cerretani (SWE/USA), is now up (G&M won in straight sets!)... confuse.gif  Not so much as a sniff of an explanation on the site! frustrated.gif



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57731
Date:

I'm still confuse.gif  Tomorrow's OoP shows the doubles final between Gil & Mergea & Aucks & Delgo or Fornell & Ouahabi! frustrated.gif

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57731
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

I'm still confuse.gif  Tomorrow's OoP shows the doubles final between Gil & Mergea & Aucks & Delgo or Fornell & Ouahabi! frustrated.gif



Must've been an unscheduled OoP change:  the match has just finished & Aucks & Delgo are into tomorrow's final, having beaten Fornell & Ouahabi 2 & 3! smile  clap.gif



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard