Boggo though has achieved the standard necessary for a WC, and so is therefore likely to get one, regardless of whether his recent performances suggest he should get one.
Good to hear that Slabba is likely to get one, and I presume that means Goodall has got one as well, so along with Baker and Boggo that makes 4 WC's. Ward today put a strong case for a WC together, while Greg Rusedski said that he believes Jamie Murray will get one, and given that he's working with the young players at the LTA, he probably knows what he's talking about
. . .or, as we say in these parts, "shy bairns get nowt".
I hope he gets one, I was impressed both with his play and his attitude yesterday. A favourable draw against a journeyman grass-hater - more likely in the big field at Wimbledon than at Queens - could see him winning a match there.
Five players have wild cards into the qualifying draw; Alex Slabinsky, Richard Bloomfield, James Ward, Ed Seator and Ken Skupski.
i guess this means bloomers, slabba and wardy wont be at notts either? i also assume josh is a DA, although i'd be suprised if the intial cut is low enough for josh to get in. maybe aeltc still waiting to make up their mind on josh.
dissapointed on chardy, ok i guess he deos deserve one, but did the frenchies ever give us one? non monsiuer
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
And Roger Draper is one one of those people that is you meet him you would really like to punch (he is currently on the BBC).
Definitely with you on that one! He really annoys me whenever I see him on tv, possibly because at least half of what he says is very questionable (the funding for travelling being a good example - I'd love to know who actually gets this funding).
dissapointed on chardy, ok i guess he deos deserve one, but did the frenchies ever give us one? non monsiuer
I'm presuming he and Suarez Navarro have been given them because their new rankings would put them in the main draw, but their old rankings (at the time of the entry for Wimbledon being decided) didn't get them entry. Like you say though, France (or any of the Slams) would never do the same if any of our players were in that position, so why favour the foreigners? It doesn't make sense to me!