Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 43 - Barnstaple 25K + H Challenger 2007.


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:
Week 43 - Barnstaple 25K + H Challenger 2007.


He is coming back to Europe for Dnepropetrovsk, so he should.

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11934
Date:

i think he should be playing shewsbury, he has won the event that week 2 years in a row now (1st sudnerland then shewbury)

i hope he gets a really nice draw in ukraine when it comes round.

__________________

 

Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.


www.alexbogdanovic.com



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Hardly anyone in the field is a nice draw. cry.gif And they normally give a wild card or two to top 50 players.




__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11934
Date:

alex should have started the match then pulled out so allinson could have got a w/o :)

hmm, maybe thats frowned on tho

__________________

 

Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.


www.alexbogdanovic.com



Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1771
Date:

Any results yet?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Haase beat Bloomers 62 36 64. cry.gif According to - http://www.livescore.com/tennis.dll

__________________

  



Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1771
Date:

Arka wrote:

Haase beat Bloomers 62 36 64. cry.gif According to - http://www.livescore.com/tennis.dll




Wow! that looks a tight one. Haase at 97 and Bloomers at 268. Well done Bloomers for giving him a game. thumbsup.gif



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Steve Darcis (Bel) bt Marcus Willis (Gbr) 6-2 6-3


Not bad.

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Willis and Pauffley got a walkover.
Fischer and Rushby beat Delgado and Moser by 76(3) 46 10-8.



Do Willis and Pauffley get the points?

__________________

  



Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 13874
Date:

No they don't Arka.

__________________
mjd


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2144
Date:

wolf wrote:

No they don't Arka.



So what does this Glossery in the rules mean then?
EXHIBIT V - GLOSSARY

......................Winners of "walkover" matches receive points and prize money as if the match had been played.

Losers of "walkover "matches receive points and prize money for round reached

unless this was their first match of the event. In that case, no points or prize money is awarded.
In the case of Challenger Series doubles, withdrawing teams receive points
and money from the previous round.




__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 57728
Date:

mjd wrote:

wolf wrote:

No they don't Arka.



So what does this Glossery in the rules mean then?
EXHIBIT V - GLOSSARY

......................Winners of "walkover" matches receive points and prize money as if the match had been played.

Losers of "walkover "matches receive points and prize money for round reached

unless this was their first match of the event. In that case, no points or prize money is awarded.
In the case of Challenger Series doubles, withdrawing teams receive points
and money from the previous round.




[My bold in the penultimate para]  It was their first match - or would've been, had it been played... wink



__________________
mjd


Challenger qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 2144
Date:

Stircrazy wrote:

EXHIBIT V - GLOSSARY

......................Winners of "walkover" matches receive points and prize money as if the match had been played.
Losers of "walkover "matches receive points and prize money for round reached
unless this was their first match of the event. In that case, no points or prize money is awarded.
In the case of Challenger Series doubles, withdrawing teams receive points
and money from the previous round.




[My bold in the penultimate para]  It was their first match - or would've been, had it been played... wink



That (...their first match.....) is a continuation of the 2nd sentance, referring to  the losers only.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

Thanks, that clears it up. Congrats to the boys, then!


They're on a 13 match unbeaten streak in Juniors so maybe they'll find a way to beat Haase and Zib.

__________________

  



Junior player

Status: Offline
Posts: 83
Date:

The boys lost 11-9 on the championship tie break. 4-6,7-5,9-11,they had 2 match points-shame!

__________________
«First  <  15 6 7 8  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard