Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Parmar's integrity won over the Challenger pro's need for easy money


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12606
Date:
Parmar's integrity won over the Challenger pro's need for easy money


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/tennis/article2562988.ece

Big Arvs admits being approached to throw a challenger match.

He declined of course.

__________________
James Ward - Alex Ward - Kyle Edmund


Top national player

Status: Offline
Posts: 3413
Date:

Just a quick note on the "Challenger Facts" at the bottom of the linked story. Harman reckons the minimum winner's cheque on the Challenger tour is $25,000. Even the winner in Mons this week in the biggest event of the year barely gets that.

Surely Harman, supposedly a very knowledgeable tennis reporter knows that the value of the tournament is the entire prize fund and not that of the winner.??



__________________

Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive....  those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience



Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

Apparently not!

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1528
Date:

I agree with Madeline....I think a lot of people have no idea how much tennis players make. The average minor league baseball player over here makes a lot more than many tennis pros ranked in the top 200 in the world. I bet there are tons of people who think that in a 15K event the winner gets 15k instead of 15k being shared throughout the field. It is shocking, but I wonder if Harman even knows.

__________________
California Dreamin.....


Social player

Status: Offline
Posts: 31
Date:

I cannot speak for Harman, of course, but someone close to him told me that he didn't do the figures at the bottom of the story - someone scouring a website in the office did that bit and sort of tagged it on the end. He's as upset as anyone that something incorrect was written as an addendum to his piece. Just thought I shoud clear that up.

__________________


Admin:Moderator + Tennis Legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12091
Date:

I thought it was odd, he is one of the better tennis writers in my opinion. That would explain it.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 12606
Date:

Maybe so, but top tennis writers shouldn't have things tagged on to their stories now should they?

__________________
James Ward - Alex Ward - Kyle Edmund


Pro player

Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
Date:

Has to be said, inflation does not really affect futures/challenger earnings either-they stay the same year on year.

Really, the ITF/ATP should insist on a revamp such that 10K=>15K, 15=>22.5 etc.-the players are getting less in effect each year. With the US dollar being so weak must add to European players woes, winning a 10K is US 1200, = 600 pound for a week's work. But only one person can get that much.....

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 10013
Date:

john wrote:

Just a quick note on the "Challenger Facts" at the bottom of the linked story. Harman reckons the minimum winner's cheque on the Challenger tour is $25,000. Even the winner in Mons this week in the biggest event of the year barely gets that.

Surely Harman, supposedly a very knowledgeable tennis reporter knows that the value of the tournament is the entire prize fund and not that of the winner.??



Agree with the general argument, but Mons isn't the biggest event of the year any more. The new Challenger at KL will be an 150K + H. 

 



__________________

  

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard