Just a quick note on the "Challenger Facts" at the bottom of the linked story. Harman reckons the minimum winner's cheque on the Challenger tour is $25,000. Even the winner in Mons this week in the biggest event of the year barely gets that.
Surely Harman, supposedly a very knowledgeable tennis reporter knows that the value of the tournament is the entire prize fund and not that of the winner.??
__________________
Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive.... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience
I agree with Madeline....I think a lot of people have no idea how much tennis players make. The average minor league baseball player over here makes a lot more than many tennis pros ranked in the top 200 in the world. I bet there are tons of people who think that in a 15K event the winner gets 15k instead of 15k being shared throughout the field. It is shocking, but I wonder if Harman even knows.
I cannot speak for Harman, of course, but someone close to him told me that he didn't do the figures at the bottom of the story - someone scouring a website in the office did that bit and sort of tagged it on the end. He's as upset as anyone that something incorrect was written as an addendum to his piece. Just thought I shoud clear that up.
Has to be said, inflation does not really affect futures/challenger earnings either-they stay the same year on year.
Really, the ITF/ATP should insist on a revamp such that 10K=>15K, 15=>22.5 etc.-the players are getting less in effect each year. With the US dollar being so weak must add to European players woes, winning a 10K is US 1200, = 600 pound for a week's work. But only one person can get that much.....
Just a quick note on the "Challenger Facts" at the bottom of the linked story. Harman reckons the minimum winner's cheque on the Challenger tour is $25,000. Even the winner in Mons this week in the biggest event of the year barely gets that.
Surely Harman, supposedly a very knowledgeable tennis reporter knows that the value of the tournament is the entire prize fund and not that of the winner.??
Agree with the general argument, but Mons isn't the biggest event of the year any more. The new Challenger at KL will be an 150K + H.