(3)Vivek Shokeen (IND) vs (q)Andrew Fitzpatrick (GBR) Matthew Smith (GBR) vs (6)Myles Blake (GBR) Robert Searle (GBR) d. (7)Vijay Kannan (IND) 7-6(3) 1-1 ret.
Lucky break for Searle. Seeded opponent withdrawing and all.
Blake vs Smith will be a nice judge of Blake's emergence but its a pity they had to meet early. Having said that, rankings wise, neither can complain at their draw.
Fitzy may be on a roll but to draw 3rd seed is pretty harsh
(LL)Tsung-Hua Yang (TPE) d. (q)Andrew Fitzpatrick (GBR) 6-1 6-2 [Yang replaces Shokeen] Matthew Smith (GBR) d. (LL)Vignesh Perna (IND) 6-4 6-3 [Perna replaces Blake] Yang gets a rematch against Fitzpatrick, and annihilates him.
And Myles Blake withdraws again. But, Matt Smith takes advantage of his lucky loser.
lol, it's nothing to do with a weird obsession...just that you guys use it as a surface I was told by one of the players that the tournament here is held on dung....of course the ITF list it as hard not dung because (a) that's what the Indians officially call it, it's a hard court made from dung...here we have hard courts made from tarmac but ITF call them hard (b) they probably wouldn't get many entering if they knew it was on dung
Why can't you accept that some tourneys over there are held on dung
And where have I said that Futures aren't played on dung?
It's just that whenever there's a Futures played in India, you pop out of nowhere and say "this is played on dung". It makes me laugh more than annoying me, actually.