1. Murray 2. Baker 3. An ageing Henman 4. An even more ageing Gregory 5. Boggo 6. A declining Federer 7. Dan Cox 8. Robert Dee
Now, that would be one hell of a Masters Cup.
__________________
Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive.... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience
Glad to see London is in the running at least. It would be amazing to see the Masters Cup played there. Any ideas as to what the venue would be? They can't use the Albert Hall can they- something about it not being big enough for ATP standards and it's not exactly a place you can easily expand...
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
imoen wrote: Glad to see London is in the running at least. It would be amazing to see the Masters Cup played there. Any ideas as to what the venue would be? They can't use the Albert Hall can they- something about it not being big enough for ATP standards and it's not exactly a place you can easily expand...
I can just see it now....Count standing on the winner's podium with both Federer and Nadal looking around in shock
-- Edited by ultimateshedman at 00:07, 2007-02-22
nice thatyou have such faith in me
i think it would be the dome, cant see anywhere else, unless they do some strnage conversion.
also on a side note:
wimbldeon has also confirmed that it is offering eqaul money. i persoanlly was againt this, but it actaully makes very little difference me as i doubt i'll be winning it either as a male or female. the good point is that it looks like it will eb equal money all the way. ratehr then just the champion (who argualbly needs it the least) http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/6385295.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/6385295.stm</a></p>
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
The Dome would be pretty good as a venue actually.
As for the equal pay, I'm on the 'equal pay for equal work' side of things so I personally woulnd't have made the change, however like Count I'm unlikely to ever win either so am not too fussed really!
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty
i think an issuse id that some of the male players male feel aggrived by this, as its obvisu who has to put more effoert in, but they will have no way of complaing without being called all sorts of derogatory terms. i think it's another case of smallsih pressure groups achiving a result, which is siomething that stems far wider than 1 tennis event.
__________________
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
On some levels it would be unfair for London to have a slam, another big tournament, plus the TMC...
But I'd LOVE it if it came here.
The Dome, in its new guise as the O2 would be a terrific venue to stage it, and given the oversubscription of Queens and Wimbledon, I think they'd have no problem packing the place. I know I'd be there every single day
I know that people will say that women work less, but then shouldn't we award people who win five setters more money than people who win in straights?
And it has nothing to do with number of matches. The "job" part of tennis players isn't the matches but what goes on behind the scenes - the training. Surely women work as hard as men do to become pros? Then why not pay them the same amount of money? In ways it's loads tougher to play on WTA than on the ATP. Most top girls need to run around the world in search of ranking points from the age of 14, which hardly any boy does. Then they have to deal with stardom from the age of 16 or even 15, which no one in the present top 100 in men's had to do except for Gasquet, Nadal and Hewitt.