Well done Jamie! Regains the British no. 1? Looks like we could have 2 players in doubles top 50 sooner than we realised!
__________________
Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive.... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience
imoen wrote: thanks soo much for the commentary Craig we really appreciate it, particularly when you brought such wonderful scores!
Seconded, not often we get to follow such brilliant coverage for a challenger. The USTA ought to pay you two to do all the US challengers, it would be an investment worth making !
john wrote: Well done Jamie! Regains the British no. 1? Looks like we could have 2 players in doubles top 50 sooner than we realised!
why do people think he regains the British no1 spot ?
I've seen that posted on several forums but James A is ranked 60 and Jamie M could only get to 65 at the most this week.
All to play for in San Jose !
I think it's because Aucks overtook last week with a final appearance and so by winning the tournament surely Jamie will re-overtake. Of course what is forgotten is that Aucks was in an ATP whereas Jamie a challenger.
As you say, all to play for in San Jose, I just hope they don't get drawn to meet each other before the finals!!
__________________
To look at a thing is quite different from seeing a thing and one does not see anything until one sees its beauty