The last set of highlights, titled niland6, has been uploaded. It shows the final points and of the match including the last one which was a Niland error.
Lipsky and Sarstrand are about to start on court one.
Jamie said that the most important thing today was his attitude. To go from a final a week ago back to qualies is a bit of a come down and he worked hard to keep his focus. Jamie dodged the question about his tactics, maybe they are secret.
Jamie will face Marcus Sarstrand in the qualifying round.
Marcus Sarstrand(SWE) d. Scott Lipsky(USA) 6-2, 6-4
This is a bit spooky. 6-2 for Sarstrand came up on the scoreboard not long after the match started, I almost posted it but then the score moved back to 2-1. Did the scorer have a preminition or is the 'livescore' running a bit behind time? Very strange.
Niall wrote: Jamie will face Marcus Sarstrand in the qualifying round.
Marcus Sarstrand(SWE) d. Scott Lipsky(USA) 6-2, 6-4
This is a bit spooky. 6-2 for Sarstrand came up on the scoreboard not long after the match started, I almost posted it but then the score moved back to 2-1. Did the scorer have a preminition or is the 'livescore' running a bit behind time? Very strange.
I saw the same thing: 6-2 5-2 to Sarstrand. Next time I looked it was 2-1 .. I assumed it meant 2-1 in sets, but no.. Sarstrand won 2-0.
Sarstrand - 28 years old, WR 419 (down from 240 two years ago). Got soundly whipped in the Durban challenger in January 6-2 6-1 in the 1st round. I wonder if he played really well against Lipsky, or if Lipsky played badly?
Strasand holdas a 1-0 lead on he H2H over Jamie. Hopeflully Jamie can overturn that. Baker for king! He's going to make it big lads! Or ami just drunk?
__________________
Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive.... those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience
ultimateshedman wrote: I guess that when Ollie was younger, the size factor wasn't such an issue and his superior court craft really told. Then after a few years I guess that he got overtaken by others who were bigger and stronger.
How many junior slams did Fed win ? Was it just junior Wimbledon ? Who were the other guys in his age group who were the top players ?
Just Junior Wimbly. But he reached the finals of the USO and won the Orange Bowl.
The big guns at that time were Nalbandian, Coria, Kristian Pless and Julien Jeanpierre.
Wow, I'm amazed he won junior Wimbledon at just 16 Do you know if Fed was one of the top juniors by that time or did he just come from nowhere ? Did he stop playing juniors at 17 and 18 once he was on the ATP tour ?
Just shows how even being an elite junior doesn't mean senior success, Pless and Jeanpierre have both made top 100 but haven't been top 75 and have now slipped back into the 100s.
I just popped over to the Dallas SB to see some of those highlights, and Ross Hutchins/Josh Goodall appear to have beaten Donald Young/somebody called P Briaud 6-4 6-3
Madeline wrote: I just popped over to the Dallas SB to see some of those highlights, and Ross Hutchins/Josh Goodall appear to have beaten Donald Young/somebody called P Briaud 6-4 6-3
Its dubs qualifying. They now faces Simmonds/Kuznetsov for a MD place.
I just watched all the video footage available. Ok, it isn't great, you can usually see only a small part of the court and don't get much idea of the play, but you get good shots of each player.
I watched the doubles highlights too, you didn't get to see much of the Brits, the cameras concentrated almost entirely on Donald Young! Not surprising I suppose.
To get livescores and ANY sort of video coverage and interviews from a challenger is staggering. But what do you expect from Dallas, Texas always has to be bigger and better
P.S. At one point there were two men watching, but I couldn't see the dog. . .