Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: ITF 2018 AGM - Davis Cup


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19012
Date:
RE: ITF 2018 AGM - Davis Cup


steven wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

But when you say "Between 2010-13, GB had a run of 7 home ties in a row, which could just as easily have been 7 away ties in a row," doesn't that mean we could also have gone three years without a home draw ? Which also shows that there could be no home ties under the old format too?


 Yes, but for 3 years not 10 (I don't know what the overall record for home or away ties is, but our 7 in a row can't be far off)


Not only that, but the 4 semi finalists will automatically qualify for the following year's final without having to participate in the Feb play-off.  So even less chance of home ties for the top teams.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34280
Date:

Bob in Spain wrote:
steven wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:

But when you say "Between 2010-13, GB had a run of 7 home ties in a row, which could just as easily have been 7 away ties in a row," doesn't that mean we could also have gone three years without a home draw ? Which also shows that there could be no home ties under the old format too?


 Yes, but for 3 years not 10 (I don't know what the overall record for home or away ties is, but our 7 in a row can't be far off)


Not only that, but the 4 semi finalists will automatically qualify for the following year's final without having to participate in the Feb play-off.  So even less chance of home ties for the top teams.


I took that into account in my calculations, Bob (plus the fact that the host team will automatically get home ties, albeit truncated 3-set 3-rubber single day ties)



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

Also worth noting as per telegraph report, match v Uzbekistan is effectively meaningless. Whatever happens Gb will be in the top 24 that play in the 12 ties next February. Apparently the 8 winners of next week's playoffs plus the 4 losing quarterfinalist s from April will be seeded the losing 8 in the play offs unseeded plus 4 from the zone 2 playoffs. so Gb playing for seeded status and no more.

Don't waste your money and avoid going to Glasgow I would suggest.



-- Edited by JonH on Thursday 16th of August 2018 10:16:16 PM

__________________
JonH


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:

Calamitous.
This $3billion won't turn up either.
But the nations fans are the ones who have lost today. Ridden over completely as the national associations are bought.


__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 7055
Date:

Davis Cup RIP. You brought us some magnificent moments whilst you were with us. Terminally killed by the capitalists and the money men, but the fans and players will always remember you. Whatever rises in your ashes, it will be but a pale shadow.

__________________


County player

Status: Offline
Posts: 828
Date:

This was a decision already known, hence the All England chairman's ****y pronouncement a couple of weeks ago whenever it was. The LTA vote against was purely a sop for public consumption, to strike an air of seeming independence. Scott LLoyd's job, in any case, is sorting out the problems here, not fooling around on the world stage.

Whatever it is now, it's not the Davis Cup. A complaint should be lodged with the Advertising Standards Authority and Fake Goods Bureau.

__________________


Intermediate Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 362
Date:

Another tournament tacked on to the end of the season too. The ATP calendar is desperately in need of a pruning.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52417
Date:

I don't know what people think of this but as most people have nailed their colours very strongly to their particular mast it's difficult to get a balanced view. Jon Wertheim (who is no fool) posted this (not guaranteeing it's a 'balanced' view but it does purport to give both sides):

www.tennis.com/pro-game/2018/08/weighing-pros-and-cons-itfs-roll-dice-davis-cup-revamp/76079/

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

This is going around on twitter - unconfirmed at the moment

See this one as well - https://twitter.com/Almighurt/status/1030546676086398976 and also Petchy's comments: https://twitter.com/_markpetchey/status/1030547231248707584



__________________


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:

The voting should be transparent.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6109
Date:

If this turns out to be true it would be scandalous and surely a sackable offence. Isnt it also a conflict of interests for Corrie to be working on behalf of Kosmos when an LTA Board member?

__________________
JonH


Strong Club Player

Status: Offline
Posts: 507
Date:

The federations have sold DC behind the fans backs. ITF the new FIFA. 99% of people are enraged by this decision. Most of the ex top pro's are saying they are disgusted.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 34280
Date:

Reading the rest of the German tennis federation chief's comments, he says nearly all the talk at the AGM was about money and hardly any about the other merits (or otherwise) of the scheme. Now that bit, sadly, I can definitely believe.



__________________

GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!

GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html



All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 5404
Date:

The thing is, the players are stuck if they want to play Olympics- at least as far as I can see.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 52417
Date:

steven wrote:

Reading the rest of the German tennis federation chief's comments, he says nearly all the talk at the AGM was about money and hardly any about the other merits (or otherwise) of the scheme. Now that bit, sadly, I can definitely believe.


Purely on the question of money, is it true that the ITF are on the verge on bankruptcy? 

Some say yes, some say no.

The ITF, I believe, say they are- hence the need to accept the money.

But surely if it's true, you wouldn't want to vote for what that board suggested because it is that very board who have shown they can't manage things properly?

And what would going bankrupt mean? 



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 4 57  >  Last»  | Page of 7  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard