Al at 4-5 FINAL SET,
Great ace, 15-0, (straight at the camera)
and another, 30-0
30-15, ball lands on al's baseline and he mi****s long
Al arguing over a call. Thought he'd served another ace, labelled the call "disgusting"
Game I think. Got a bit confusing then,
5-5
Silly at 5-5,
15-0, forehand winner to Al's backhand corner,
30-0, short return, put away by Cilic,
40-0, return long,
Game, Cilic forehnad winner
6-5 Cilic Final set
Count Zero - Creator of the Statistical Tennis Extrapolation & Verification ENtity or, as we like to call him, that steven.
www.alexbogdanovic.com
johnnylad wrote:Al at 4-5 FINAL SET,Great ace, 15-0, (straight at the camera)and another, 30-030-15, ball lands on al's baseline and he mi****s longAl arguing over a call. Thought he'd served another ace, labelled the call "disgusting"Game I think. Got a bit confusing then,5-5
GB on a shirt, Davis Cup still gleaming, 79 years of hurt, never stopped us dreaming ... 29/11/2015 that dream came true!GB top 25s (ranks, whereabouts) & stats - http://www.britishtennis.net/stats.html
Cilic seems to have a lot more power from the back of the court, though Alex seems to manage to keep the ball lower.
Nice low smash from Alex to win the last point.
EDIT: I think I may have mixed the two players up!
EDIt 2: No, right the first time. Cilic seemed to hit a 2nd serve ball away at the end of the last game, that's what confused me.
Tiebreak, anyway.
Al at 5-6 Final set, serving to stay in match again,
Boggo making him wait
15-0, backhand winner after rally,
30-0, forehand smash volley after overpowering Cilic,
40-0, Cilic returns long,
6-6 Tiebreak
johnnylad wrote: Al at 5-6 Final set, serving to stay in match again,Boggo making him wait15-0, backhand winner after rally,30-0, forehand smash volley after overpowering Cilic,40-0, Cilic returns long,6-6 Tiebreak
Thats a good way to go into a TB
I think it's 5-2 Cilic with a double break and about to serve
EDIT: except they haven't changed ends (or have they - so hard to see when they're both wearing the same thing!) in which case it can't be ...