British Tennis Forum - Celebrating 20 Years!

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 36 - WTT W50 - Evora, Portugal - Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 31722
Date:
Week 36 - WTT W50 - Evora, Portugal - Hard


QR1:- Sofia Johnson (GBR) WR459 [Q3] v Isabella Marton (CAN) WR895

QR1:- Jodie Anna Burrage (GBR) WR674 [Q15] v Tatsiana Sasnouskaya (***) UNR/UNR [QWC]



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 31722
Date:

Quite a battle !

QR1:- Jodie Anna Burrage (GBR) WR674 [Q15] def Tatsiana Sasnouskaya (***) UNR/UNR [QWC] 3-6 6-1 7-6(4)

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 31722
Date:

QR1:- Sofia Johnson (GBR) WR459 [Q3] def Isabella Marton (CAN) WR895 6-1 6-0

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 31722
Date:

FQR:- Sofia Johnson (GBR) WR459 [Q3] v Mary Lewis (USA) WR696

FQR:- Jodie Anna Burrage (GBR) WR674 [Q15] v Jo-Yee Chan (USA) WR745

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1774
Date:

the addict wrote:

Quite a battle !

QR1:- Jodie Anna Burrage (GBR) WR674 [Q15] def Tatsiana Sasnouskaya (***) UNR/UNR [QWC] 3-6 6-1 7-6(4)


 Jodie still struggling. Is she lacking match fitness or has her game regressed since her return?



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 31722
Date:

I think Tatsiana lack of ranking isn't the true picture. She has a CH of WR1273 from 2019 (she's 24), but raeched the SF of a W15 from qualifying last week.

She didn't compete at all for almost three years from November 2023 until last week. Before that she was at Old Dominion, where she partnered Sofia Johnson in doubles.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62472
Date:

the addict wrote:

I think Tatsiana lack of ranking isn't the true picture. She has a CH of WR1273 from 2019 (she's 24), but raeched the SF of a W15 from qualifying last week.

She didn't compete at all for almost three years from November 2023 until last week. Before that she was at Old Dominion, where she partnered Sofia Johnson in doubles.


 Sorry but that's pretty weak

No pro tennis for three years, was unranked as a junior, a good college career but that's a while back now (she went to Texas after Old Dom), a negligble CH, and one W15 SF? 

Yes, her lack of ranking might be misleading - she should really be WR 1100, say - or even W900, if you want

But unless she's been winning UTR events left right and centre, you couldn't re-rank her any higher than that and dodrade is making a pertinent point 

 



__________________
KK


Club Coach

Status: Offline
Posts: 718
Date:

dodrade wrote:
the addict wrote:

Quite a battle !

QR1:- Jodie Anna Burrage (GBR) WR674 [Q15] def Tatsiana Sasnouskaya (***) UNR/UNR [QWC] 3-6 6-1 7-6(4)


 Jodie still struggling. Is she lacking match fitness or has her game regressed since her return?


 Yet she has been chosen ahead of Fran for BJ Cup match!



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 31722
Date:

Coup Droit wrote:
the addict wrote:

I think Tatsiana lack of ranking isn't the true picture. She has a CH of WR1273 from 2019 (she's 24), but raeched the SF of a W15 from qualifying last week.

She didn't compete at all for almost three years from November 2023 until last week. Before that she was at Old Dominion, where she partnered Sofia Johnson in doubles.


 Sorry but that's pretty weak

No pro tennis for three years, was unranked as a junior, a good college career but that's a while back now (she went to Texas after Old Dom), a negligble CH, and one W15 SF? 

Yes, her lack of ranking might be misleading - she should really be WR 1100, say - or even W900, if you want

But unless she's been winning UTR events left right and centre, you couldn't re-rank her any higher than that and dodrade is making a pertinent point 

 


Perhaps I should have said a bit more. Yes, dodrade has a valid point and I hope it was just a bad day for Jodie.

As for the W15 SF last week (and first pro-tournament for three years), Tatsiana beat Pericard WR925 and Mettraux WR534=CH on the way, so not a complete rookie. Which is what I was getting at.

We'll see how Jodie gets on today against Chan, who has a genuine ranking of 745, but was well beaten by Sofia last week.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 45859
Date:

the addict wrote:
Coup Droit wrote:
the addict wrote:

I think Tatsiana lack of ranking isn't the true picture. She has a CH of WR1273 from 2019 (she's 24), but raeched the SF of a W15 from qualifying last week.

She didn't compete at all for almost three years from November 2023 until last week. Before that she was at Old Dominion, where she partnered Sofia Johnson in doubles.


 Sorry but that's pretty weak

No pro tennis for three years, was unranked as a junior, a good college career but that's a while back now (she went to Texas after Old Dom), a negligble CH, and one W15 SF? 

Yes, her lack of ranking might be misleading - she should really be WR 1100, say - or even W900, if you want

But unless she's been winning UTR events left right and centre, you couldn't re-rank her any higher than that and dodrade is making a pertinent point 

 


Perhaps I should have said a bit more. Yes, dodrade has a valid point and I hope it was just a bad day for Jodie.

As for the W15 SF last week (and first pro-tournament for three years), Tatsiana beat Pericard WR925 and Mettraux WR534=CH on the way, so not a complete rookie. Which is what I was getting at.

We'll see how Jodie gets on today against Chan, who has a genuine ranking of 745, but was well beaten by Sofia last week.


Sorry TA, she beat WRs 925 and 534 on the way ( most certainly not a complete rookie but still ... )  I guess it was already evident that Jodie wasn't in the BJK Cup for her singles but as a possible doubles partner for Harriet. And she's a nice enthusiastic girl ... ( who I actually genuinely like but the BJK Cup squad looks a nonsense ).



-- Edited by indiana on Monday 7th of September 2026 08:52:49 AM



__________________


Club Coach

Status: Online
Posts: 631
Date:

But then it begs the question, if you're picking a doubles partner for Harriet why aren't you picking Maia?

__________________


Futures qualifying

Status: Offline
Posts: 1566
Date:

sammmm wrote:

But then it begs the question, if you're picking a doubles partner for Harriet why aren't you picking Maia?


 The selectors know best what they are doing. No Emma or Sonay does not help nor does Mika who is on a long losing run.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 62472
Date:

GAMEOVER wrote:
sammmm wrote:

But then it begs the question, if you're picking a doubles partner for Harriet why aren't you picking Maia?


 The selectors know best what they are doing. No Emma or Sonay does not help nor does Mika who is on a long losing run.


 Sorry, but that's like saying Trump knows best what's good for America - some people will think he does, of course, but sammmmm is right and it's perfectly fine to say just because someone is in charge, it doesn't mean that one can't query their decisions 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 45859
Date:

GAMEOVER wrote:
sammmm wrote:

But then it begs the question, if you're picking a doubles partner for Harriet why aren't you picking Maia?


 The selectors know best what they are doing. No Emma or Sonay does not help nor does Mika who is on a long losing run.


 But Mika is in the squad !  And as CD says. British women discussion section.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 19008
Date:

Jodie on the cusp of qualifying

__________________
1 2 35  >  Last»  | Page of 5  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard