Whilst looking through the qualifying draw for RG I could not help but notice what countries have a large participation in the event...apart from the French wildcards.....heres the top nations.....
RG Main and Qualifying draws. (Selected countries)
France - 33 players (includes French WC's) Spain - 21 players Argentina - 17 players Germany - 17 players USA - 18 players CZE Republic - 13 players Italy - 13 players Russia - 7 players Australia - 6 players Serbia and Montenegro - 6 players Croatia - 6 players Brazil - 6 players Sweden - 5 players
GBR - 5 players
This thread is not about RG so thats why it is here. It is about our current lack in depth.
This gets shown up time and time again.....Davis Cup in Glasgow for one in the recent memory.
Rodger Draper has his work cut out to improve the LTA so that the organisation can contribute to the talent pool. Those who managed to qualify for RG are ranked much higher than the likes of Boggo....I know on another day he would have taken that last set 6-3 but he didnt !
So please will the likes of Alex Bogdanovic, Jame Baker, Colin Fleming, Andrew Kennaugh please stand-up !
If not then are we to look to the likes of Graeme Dyce, Dan Cox, Dan Evans, Chris Eaton etc for the future top 100 players ?????
This is not a new issue but British Tennis needs to keeping pushing and pushing and not become stagnated....hopefully Mr Draper wont let that happen.
-- Edited by Stircrazy on Sunday 22nd of January 2017 10:07:18 AM
Whilst looking through the qualifying draw for RG I could not help but notice what countries have a large participation in the event...apart from the French wildcards.....heres the top nations.....
RG Main and Qualifying draws. (Selected countries)
France - 33 players (includes French WC's) Spain - 21 players Argentina - 17 players Germany - 17 players USA - 18 players CZE Republic - 13 players Italy - 13 players Russia - 7 players Australia - 6 players Serbia and Montenegro - 6 players Croatia - 6 players Brazil - 6 players Sweden - 5 players
GBR - 5 players
This thread is not about RG so thats why it is here. It is about our current lack in depth.
This gets shown up time and time again.....Davis Cup in Glasgow for one in the recent memory.
Rodger Draper has his work cut out to improve the LTA so that the organisation can contribute to the talent pool. Those who managed to qualify for RG are ranked much higher than the likes of Boggo....I know on another day he would have taken that last set 6-3 but he didnt !
So please will the likes of Alex Bogdanovic, Jame Baker, Colin Fleming, Andrew Kennaugh please stand-up !
If not then are we to look to the likes of Graeme Dyce, Dan Cox, Dan Evans, Chris Eaton etc for the future top 100 players ?????
This is not a new issue but British Tennis needs to keeping pushing and pushing and not become stagnated....hopefully Mr Draper wont let that happen.
Growing the game is a very long process, I agree depth remains an issue but we are now likely to have 3 top 50 players through 2017 which puts a very different face on UK men's tennis.
I haven't ever seen whole page spreads through the first week of foreign slams day in day out before! The DC cup win lifted U.K. Men's profile for a couple of weeks but if the boys can keep this up the sports pages may be worth more than a custody glance for a whole year! A couple of years with a day in day out media presence and who knows how that plays out 6-10 years hence.
There is a cohort of players in their early to mid 20's with the potential to develop/step up to top 100 in Glasspool, Broady, Cam and Brydan along with two or three teenagers with a good chance of making their mark on the top 100 in the next 5 years. Not meaning to apply any pressure but the chance of the name Draper and his legacy populating this thread in another decades time is not zero, although his modus operandum may more closely resembling Judy's than he had originally planned. A plan B not open to most leaders of the LTA. Time will tell!
-- Edited by Oakland2002 on Sunday 22nd of January 2017 08:46:05 PM
Yes, growing the top ranks can take time and the effects of having 3 top 50 players may be significant but quite far down the line. Kyle and Dan are very different, differing routes too to where they currently are, which can only help the overall spread of still young players or not even players yet who could in time push through.
In truth I personally don't currently see a cohort of players in early to mid twenties that really look to have top 100 potential ( great if I was wrong, and of course all the best to those who strive to be the best that they can be ). Cam will be interesting to follow, but beyond him and there could always say be one surprise, I think we are looking to a younger generation to follow on. And inspiration is often found from the deeds of others from the same nation that kids can relate to. So the follow on future to our current top 50 players could be very good but it may be a wait ...
I think in Andys defeat today it will give us an indication of how much we will miss him when he goes in 3 or 4 years time. I can't really see a Grand Slam winner or even contender in the next 5-10 with the current crop, Kyle is the only outside chance. This discussion will certainly arise again when Andy does retire. Politics will creep in again. Brexit and social policy and culture etc to be added to the discussion no doubt.
Any impact of Murray's legacy will not be felt for years, I mean if a child 6-10 saw Murray win Wimby in 2012, they will be only 11-15 now, so maybe another 5 years until we see a new generation emerge.
Edmund and Evans have been a breath of fresh air, but also distracted us from the dire problem down the rankings, the depth is appalling.
NoCam maybe a top 100 player, and not seen much of Jay Clarke, but there is little else at this time.
Andy will barring injury be around for some time, we have a couple of decent prospects at 16 who both seem self motivated difficult to predict re how academic commitments will impact but if they both have good years in juniors this year and start transition next things maybe looking rosier.
In a couple of years time we may have Andy, Evo at his peak, Kyle approaching 24 hopefully going deep into slams, Cam hopefully main draw perhaps one of or all of Brydan, Lloyd, and Liam there or there abouts maybe Jay and maybe a couple of youngsters trying to be top 200 before they are 20. It is what it is, a quality player every 4-5 years or so but in my lifetime that is as deep as I have ever seen it.
Andy will barring injury be around for some time, we have a couple of decent prospects at 16 who both seem self motivated difficult to predict re how academic commitments will impact but if they both have good years in juniors this year and start transition next things maybe looking rosier.
In a couple of years time we may have Andy, Evo at his peak, Kyle approaching 24 hopefully going deep into slams, Cam hopefully main draw perhaps one of or all of Brydan, Lloyd, and Liam there or there abouts maybe Jay and maybe a couple of youngsters trying to be top 200 before they are 20. It is what it is, a quality player every 4-5 years or so but in my lifetime that is as deep as I have ever seen it.
Indeed, and in line with much of that and these players' general progress to date very probably no cohort of potential top 100 players from Cam, Liam, Brydan and Lloyd, with Cam currently looking the most likely. Where or whereabouts they will generally settle time will tell.
Those possible couple of youngsters trying to be top 200 before they are top 20, beyond Jay, and that's still a road for him ( but at least he seems to maybe be on it ), any names ?
-- Edited by indiana on Sunday 22nd of January 2017 10:02:33 PM
Andy will barring injury be around for some time, we have a couple of decent prospects at 16 who both seem self motivated difficult to predict re how academic commitments will impact but if they both have good years in juniors this year and start transition next things maybe looking rosier.
In a couple of years time we may have Andy, Evo at his peak, Kyle approaching 24 hopefully going deep into slams, Cam hopefully main draw perhaps one of or all of Brydan, Lloyd, and Liam there or there abouts maybe Jay and maybe a couple of youngsters trying to be top 200 before they are 20. It is what it is, a quality player every 4-5 years or so but in my lifetime that is as deep as I have ever seen it.
Indeed, and in line with much of that and these players' general progress to date very probably no cohort of potential top 100 players from Cam, Liam, Brydan and Lloyd, with Cam currently looking the most likely. Where or whereabouts they will generally settle time will tell.
Those possible couple of youngsters trying to be top 200 before they are top 20, beyond Jay, and that's still a road for him ( but at least he seems to maybe be on it ), any names ?
-- Edited by indiana on Sunday 22nd of January 2017 10:02:33 PM
Yeh clutching at straws, only hope is that the average age of the top 100 and thus the average to break the top 100 is getting older and older.
What happened to Liam? He must have had something about him to get to 150 at such a young age?
We have two in the top 10, 2001 year by age, Jack (almost 2002) at 1 and Anton at 7 who hasn't played much recently at U18 level, there are many variables still in play, particularly how serious a commitment they make to education.
Both are in a good place to be very highly ranked as juniors by the year end 2019 although my hope is their junior ranks will have been dipping for 9 months or so as their focus will shift to futures before they turn 18. That said I would not be surprised to see at least one follow the college route through their own volition much in the way Cam has.
To paint an alternative view OG was also good enough to be a top 100 player but professional tennis not stimulating enough to retain his attention, if he were still in play that would also make the depth chart look a bit healthier. I don't see British tennis being in anyway responsible for OG not transitioning.
Oli G dropping tennis was directly linked to the LTA's actions. I'm not saying the LTA were wrong, as such, but it's how it happened.
Oli was doing fine (enough), part of the NTC group, and the chosen few, and all looked hunky dory (in general).
But in a short space of time, various things happened, including:
the NTC closed as a training hub for the top players (which was more of a major blow to Oli than others because he lives so close);
the LTA wanted him to skip Wimbledon and go to the States (with Liam etc). Oli refused and the LTA got the hump;
Oli went on a tour to Kazakhstan etc. with no coach/trainer (coz the LTA weren;t playing ball any more) and had a pretty miserable time;
Oli quit.
Given his age (both actual and the fact he was a rather 'immature' bloke, which is not meant as a criticism) and his potential and the amount the LTA had invested in him already, I think the LTA most certainly could have handled things a LOT better: it's their job.