Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Week 43 - ITF W60 - Glasgow, Great Britain Hard


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18077
Date:
Week 43 - ITF W60 - Glasgow, Great Britain Hard


Q1: DUNNE, Katy (GBR) (1) 343 (CH=212 2018) v Bye 

Q1: CHRISTIE, Freya (GBR) (12) 565 (CH=286 2016} v PASKAUSKAS, Gabi (GBR) UNR =CH {17yo JCH=138}

Q1: XU, Mingge (GBR) 1235 (CH=1033 2023) {16yo JCH=14} v GIMBRERE, Jasmijn (NED) (11) 542 (CH=442 2023) 

They met in Loughborough in 2022 with Jasmine winning in three. 

Q1: KNOWLES, Aimee (GBR) UNR =CH {16yo JCH=1682} v PASZEK, Tamira (AUT) (3) 367 (CH=26 2013) 

Q1: APPLETON, Emily (GBR) (4)368 =CH v SIMPSON, Francesca (GBR) UNR =CH {16yo JCH=1146} 

Q1: WILSON, Emma (GBR) 995 (CH=803 2023) v ZELNICKOVA, Radka (SVK) (13) 583 (CH=475 2023) 

Q1: MCDONALD, Ella (GBR) 999 (CH=923 2023) {18yo JCH=8} v RYSER, Valentina (SUI) (5) 370 =CH

They met in Glasgow earlier this year with Valentina winning 0 & 2.

Q1: HADDAD, Imogen (GBR) UNR =CH {18yo JCH=107} v RINALDO PERSSON, Kajsa (SWE) (6) 410 (CH=354 2023) 

Q1; GILLAN, Alice (GBR) 807 (CH=685 2019) v  STRESNAKOVA, Katarina (SVK (10) 539 (CH=534 2023) 

They met in Nottingham earlier this year with Alice winning 3 & 4. 

Q1: MALONEY, Eliz (GBR) (7) 453 (CH=371 2023) v OLUWADARE, Hephzibah (GBR) UNR =CH {15yo JCH=57} 

Q1: HUTCHINSON, Holly (GBR) 1368 (CH=1124 2022) v BOLKVADZE, Mariam (GEO) (16) 720 (CH=151 2022) 

They met in Loughborough in 2015 with Mariam winning 5 & 0.

Q1: RAATH, Marilee (GBR) UNR =CH {17yo JCH=182} v KOEVERMANS, Anouk (NED) (8) 471 (CH=468 2023) 

Q1: AMOS, Abigail (GBR) 1057 (CH=999 2023) v MORVAYOVA, Viktoria (SVK) (9) 476 (CH=343 2022) 

 

Anna Brogan and I assume Marni will  have been moved to the MDI, so that leaves Isabelle Lacy for 1 WC. Hannah Klugman is in the Alts list so she seems certain for another one unless she is taking a rest. Harriet, Lily and Katie Swan are already in the MD. 



-- Edited by Peter too on Sunday 22nd of October 2023 11:33:47 AM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:
Week 42 - ITF W60 - Glasgow, Great Britain Hard


I think Mimi may well have a wildcard.

And possibly Kat Barnes too

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11661
Date:

Mimi does not need a wild card. She is in qualifying on merit.

__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2635
Date:

As mentioned in the entries thread, Katie Swan withdrew earlier today.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

DF wrote:

Mimi does not need a wild card. She is in qualifying on merit.


 So sorry - I missed her name ....



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18077
Date:

Brooke Black is a 15 year old with a JCH=329 so she might get one. I haven't seen Sonay's name recently is she injured?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 17383
Date:

Marni has a SE
Anna Brogan seems certain to have a wildcard alongside Isabelle Lacy and Hannah Klugman.
The last one - Heather Watson, Sonay Kartel, Fran Jones or Ranah Stoiber



-- Edited by paulisi on Saturday 21st of October 2023 09:59:41 PM

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 18077
Date:
RE: Week 43 - ITF W60 - Glasgow, Great Britain Hard


paulisi wrote:

Marni has a SE
Anna Brogan seems certain to have a wildcard alongside Isabelle Lacy and Hannah Klugman.
The last one - Heather Watson, Sonay Kartel, Fran Jones or Ranah Stoiber



-- Edited by paulisi on Saturday 21st of October 2023 09:59:41 PM


 Anna gets in anyway, in the acceptances she was above the top seeds in qualifying. It's possible that Heather is in Tampico this week. The Q draw has been published but I am waiting for the MD.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 55270
Date:

Yes, Isa is certain for a wc.

And, as you say, Peter, Anna doesn't need one.

Given Hannah's junior schedule, and success last week, it's possible she won't be here.

So there's still quite a few up fro grabs.

Paulisi has a point but Ranah, Sonay and Fran all withdrew a while ago - although I guess it's possible that they've changed their minds.

So I'm still going for someone less likely - like Kat, or some youngster, maybe with Scottish connection

Still upsetting that there are two vacant slots....



__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11661
Date:

16 year old Aimee Jayne Knowles seems to have been thrown into the deep end. Has she any experience in playing any tennis ?

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41488
Date:

DF wrote:

16 year old Aimee Jayne Knowles seems to have been thrown into the deep end. Has she any experience in playing any tennis ?


 Presumably she has played tennis before biggrin



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 23247
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
DF wrote:

16 year old Aimee Jayne Knowles seems to have been thrown into the deep end. Has she any experience in playing any tennis ?


 Presumably she has played tennis before biggrin


 She's played a number of junior tournaments in this country this year and won a few rounds, including reaching a SF in the J30 in Edinburgh in July.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 41488
Date:

the addict wrote:
JonH comes home wrote:
DF wrote:

16 year old Aimee Jayne Knowles seems to have been thrown into the deep end. Has she any experience in playing any tennis ?


 Presumably she has played tennis before biggrin


 She's played a number of junior tournaments in this country this year and won a few rounds, including reaching a SF in the J30 in Edinburgh in July.


 its ok I was just joking about the any tennis comment. as in taking it literally you had to be on my wavelength !



__________________


Challenger level

Status: Offline
Posts: 2635
Date:

Heather arrived in Tampico on Thursday. They're making a big deal of her being there, more than any other player. Anyway, even if she had withdrawn from Tampico as she was on the acceptance list there she isn't eligible for a WC here.

Fran withdrew from her next 2 weeks of tournaments on Friday. Sonay is a possibility if her rehab from whatever her injury was has gone better than expected, but given the tribulations of Katie and Fran last week I'd caution her against returning too soon.

Would they really give Katherine Barnes a WC to a 60k ahead of Mimi? A WC for Barnes would give her a 3rd counter and a WTA ranking.

Anna would only be directly in if Marni hasn't taken her SE, otherwise Anna needs a WC. But as next in, they can just not use that WC and Anna would then be in directly. Either way, it looks though she's in the main draw.

A WC for Isabelle, as seems certain, would be using 1 of the 2 merit WCs she's earned for winning a match with a WC as she used the last of her standard 3 ITF MD WCs last week. It would actually be her 5th ITF MD WC this year but 1 in Roehampton doesn't count as she didn't get a counter from it.

I'm struggling to identify who the last WC could be. Everyone I'd give a WC to ahead of Mimi is in qualifying, withdrawn in the last week, committed elsewhere or injured.

Aimee won the Scottish National Indoor Championships, a British/Scottish Tour event in Stirling in February and often gets to the latter stages of the British Tour events she enters (which being from Tyneside tend to be the Scottish and Northern ones).

__________________
DF


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 11661
Date:

Lambda wrote:

Heather arrived in Tampico on Thursday. They're making a big deal of her being there, more than any other player. Anyway, even if she had withdrawn from Tampico as she was on the acceptance list there she isn't eligible for a WC here.

Fran withdrew from her next 2 weeks of tournaments on Friday. Sonay is a possibility if her rehab from whatever her injury was has gone better than expected, but given the tribulations of Katie and Fran last week I'd caution her against returning too soon.

Would they really give Katherine Barnes a WC to a 60k ahead of Mimi? A WC for Barnes would give her a 3rd counter and a WTA ranking.

Anna would only be directly in if Marni hasn't taken her SE, otherwise Anna needs a WC. But as next in, they can just not use that WC and Anna would then be in directly. Either way, it looks though she's in the main draw.

A WC for Isabelle, as seems certain, would be using 1 of the 2 merit WCs she's earned for winning a match with a WC as she used the last of her standard 3 ITF MD WCs last week. It would actually be her 5th ITF MD WC this year but 1 in Roehampton doesn't count as she didn't get a counter from it.

I'm struggling to identify who the last WC could be. Everyone I'd give a WC to ahead of Mimi is in qualifying, withdrawn in the last week, committed elsewhere or injured.

Aimee won the Scottish National Indoor Championships, a British/Scottish Tour event in Stirling in February and often gets to the latter stages of the British Tour events she enters (which being from Tyneside tend to be the Scottish and Northern ones).


 Thank you



__________________
1 2 320  >  Last»  | Page of 20  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard