QR1: (q1) Luca Castelnuovo (SUI) UNR (CH = 647 last December) (ITF 217) vs James Story UNR (ITF 2120) QR1: Euan Wilson Baig UNR vs (q10) Patrick Foley UNR (CH = 1384 last December) (ITF 1146)
QR1: (q2) Raphael Baltensperger (SUI) UNR (CH = 678 in November 2017) (ITF 378) vs Harry Meehan UNR (CH = 974 in June 2014) (ITF 2171) QR1: George Foster UNR (ITF 2425) vs (q11) Sean Hodkin UNR (CH = 1182 last June) (ITF 1218)
QR1: (q3) Mats Rosenkranz (GER) UNR (CH = 700 last November) (ITF 379) vs Alexander Romay UNR (ITF 2231) QR1: (qWC) Daniel Bennett UNR (ITF UNR) vs (q16) Adam Jones UNR (CH = 1580 April) (ITF 1477)
QR1: (q4) Jonathan Binding UNR (CH = 1045 last November) vs Matthew Clegg UNR (ITF UNR) QR1: Jack Gibbens UNR (ITF 2546) vs (q12) Scott Duncan UNR (CH = 1520 last November)
QR1: (q5) Nicolas Rosenzweig (FRA) UNR (CH = 687 last September) vs Connor Thomson UNR (ITF UNR) QR1: Nicholas Nugent UNR (ITF 3088) vs (q13) Adan Freire da Silva (FRA) UNR (CH = 1498 last October) (ITF 1398)
QR1: (q6) Valentin Günther (GER) UNR (CH = 989 last August) vs (qWC) Johannus Monday UNR (ITF UNR) QR1: Robert Carter UNR (CH = 803 in May 2015) (ITF 1796) vs (q14) Sizya Kivanda UNR (CH = 1716 last October)
QR1: (q7) Patrik Hartmeier (SUI) UNR (CH = 1292 last October) (ITF 997) vs James Mackinley UNR (ITF UNR) QR1: David Quayle UNR (ITF 2235) vs (q9) Anton Matusevich UNR (CH = 1350 last October) (ITF 1041)
QR1: (q8) Francisco Dias (POR) UNR (CH = 954 in September 2011 - he'll be 27 next month) (ITF 1038) vs Elliott Farmer UNR (ITF 1731) QR1: (qWC) Clay Crawford UNR (CH = 1606 in October 2014) vs (q15) Ben Jones UNR (CH = 1867 last September) (ITF 1428)
Tough draw for Connor Thompson, it would be nice to see him pick up some ITF points before he goes off to South Carolina to join Paul Jubb. I am sure he will get plenty of opportunities and really add to their programme but a rank would clearly bench marks the level hes at on starting.
As per the womens side, it will be interesting to see who comes out top of these indoor hard events; if the LTA had anything about them the overall player with most wins (or in some points table) would be rewarded with a guaranteed wild card into Wimbledon or at least one of the big grass events pre Wimbledon.
QR1: James Story UNR (ITF 2120) defeated (q1) Luca Castelnuovo (SUI) UNR by 3 & 4 QR1: Euan Wilson Baig UNR defeated (q10) Patrick Foley UNR (ITF 1146) by 6-7(1) 6-4 [11-9] in two hours & 10 minutes!
QR1: (q2) Raphael Baltensperger (SUI) UNR defeated Harry Meehan UNR (ITF 2171) by 5 & 2 QR1: (q11) Sean Hodkin UNR (ITF 1218) defeated George Foster UNR (ITF 2425) by 6-2 4-6 [10-5]
QR1: (q3) Mats Rosenkranz (GER) UNR (ITF 379) defeated Alexander Romay UNR (ITF 2231) by 3-1 retired QR1: (q16) Adam Jones UNR (ITF 1477) defeated (qWC) Daniel Bennett UNR (ITF UNR) by 4 & 2
QR1: (q4) Jonathan Binding UNR defeated Matthew Clegg UNR (ITF UNR) by 2 & 2 QR1: (q12) Scott Duncan UNR (ITF 1398) defeated Jack Gibbens UNR (ITF 2546) by 3 & 5
QR1: (qWC) Johannus Monday UNR (ITF UNR) "defeated" (q6) Valentin Günther (GER) UNR by a walkover
*****
FQR: James Story UNR (ITF 2120) vs Euan Wilson Baig UNR
FQR: (q2) Raphael Baltensperger (SUI) UNR vs (q11) Sean Hodkin UNR (ITF 1218)
FQR: (q3) Mats Rosenkranz (GER) UNR (ITF 379) vs (q16) Adam Jones UNR (ITF 1477)
FQR: (q4) Jonathan Binding UNR vs (q12) Scott Duncan UNR (ITF 1398)
As per the womens side, it will be interesting to see who comes out top of these indoor hard events; if the LTA had anything about them the overall player with most wins (or in some points table) would be rewarded with a guaranteed wild card into Wimbledon or at least one of the big grass events pre Wimbledon.
The main difference here is that the likes of Jodie, Emma and Maia have all beaten top 200 players in these tournaments this year, the likes of Kalinskaya, Badosa-Gibert, Von Deichmann, the Greek girl with the long name, Anderson and even Shinikova at 220 - all of those players will feature in Wimbledon quallies, so it is generally a few level above who the men have beaten in these events. You look at the M Sunderland entry list and the 2nd seed is ATP 377, whereas Bolton W25 had 7 players in the top 200 last week.
I do like the idea in theory though, the US do the cumulative system for a lot of their smaller tournaments leading to MDWCs into the likes of Indian Wells and the US Open, but beating a bunch of 300/400/unranked players doesn't really do much for Wimbledon WC credentials - maybe entry into a smaller event like you also suggested, perhaps a MDWC or QWC into an Eastbourne or a MDWC into one of the challengers, if needed.
-- Edited by Ace Ventura on Monday 8th of April 2019 10:40:22 AM
As per the womens side, it will be interesting to see who comes out top of these indoor hard events; if the LTA had anything about them the overall player with most wins (or in some points table) would be rewarded with a guaranteed wild card into Wimbledon or at least one of the big grass events pre Wimbledon.
The main difference here is that the likes of Jodie, Emma and Maia have all beaten top 200 players in these tournaments this year, the likes of Kalinskaya, Badosa-Gibert, Von Deichmann, the Greek girl with the long name, Anderson and even Shinikova at 220 - all of those players will feature in Wimbledon quallies, so it is generally a few level above who the men have beaten in these events. You look at the M Sunderland entry list and the 2nd seed is ATP 377, whereas Bolton W25 had 7 players in the top 200 last week.
I do like the idea in theory though, the US do the cumulative system for a lot of their smaller tournaments leading to MDWCs into the likes of Indian Wells and the US Open, but beating a bunch of 300/400/unranked players doesn't really do much for Wimbledon WC credentials - maybe entry into a smaller event like you also suggested, perhaps a MDWC or QWC into an Eastbourne or a MDWC into one of the challengers, if needed.
-- Edited by Ace Ventura on Monday 8th of April 2019 10:40:22 AM
You are of course correct AV, totally understand. My main point, though, (and others here will have seen me post about this before) is the creation of some sort of narrative. I like it when you can see a story unfold and by putting a few events together you can create that sort of league table linked to that with a clearly known reward at the end, rather than an event in splendid isolation - which of course is relevant as the players gain WR points of course (ITF or ATP/WTA) - but linking them for me creates that story.
Back in the day (I hate that phrase) the ITF grouped events into a Satellite Circuit where 3 events would lead to points for the subsequent Satellite Masters event which was the 4th week. Probably the Masters wouldnt fit now as the players would want to be off but if 3 events or 4 events could be linked in some way towards wild cards, I think that would be a good thing on both the mens and womens side of the Tours.
I guess this year ( as last ) we are hardly inundated with GB Wimbledon WC contendors so a Wimbledon QWC for a home ITF race leader would probably work - an enticing reward and not denying another particularly strong candidate, I would like to think / hope that we will be in a better position in coming years but that does at best look possibly a few years down the line.
Though yes, as Ace says, our women are general pllaying and beating better players in their 25Ks.
I initially regarded women's 25Ks as sort of mini challengers when we had men's 10 & 15Ks and women's 10 & 25s. For whatever reasons they made the prizemoney the same at each's two lowest levels. But retaining the relatively high women's 25K points ( and now continuing to hsve these as main ranking points ) leaves the women's 25Ks clearly looked on by players as higher status compared to the men"s 25Ks.