Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Doubles movers


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 32629
Date:
RE: Doubles movers


Strongbow wrote:

08/05/23

WTA

Summer Yardley in at 1514 . 1 from Nottingham
Paulina Jurkowska up 28 to 1478. 1 from Nottingham
Francesca Simpson up 28 to 1478. 1 from Nottingham
Jaquelyn Ogunwale in at 1334.  9 from Nottingham
Given Roach in at 1334.  1 from Nottingham
Jasmine Conway up 49 to 1282. 1 from Nottingham
Nadia Rawson down 347 to 1250. 19 off from Nottingham
Matilda Mutavdzic up 3 to 1028. 1 from Antalya
Danielle Daley up 168 to 948. 9 from Nottingham replace 1
Rebbeca Hill down 392 to 1334. 18 off from Nottingham
Jessica Matthews up 7 to 967. 1 from Nottingham
Anna Popescu up 326 to 899. 18 from Nottingham
Katie Swan down 27 to 888. 2 off
Holly Hutchinson up 234 to 839. 19 from Nottingham
Madeleine Brooks up 108 to 744. 19 from Nottingham
Abigail Amos up 30 to 654. 10 from Telde replace 2
Emma Wilson up 33 to 555. 9 from Nottingham replace 1 off
Eliz Maloney up 22 to 430. 19 from Nottinghan replace 2
Yuriko Lily Miyazaki up 1 to 406. 40 from USA replace 40 off
Tara Moore down 78 to 310.
Lauryn John-Baptiste up 12 to 332. 50 from Nottinghan replace 30 off
Emily Webley-Smith down 6 to 188 ?
Maia Lumsden up 42 to 154. 120 from Calvi/Nottingham replace 10
Naiktha Bains up 30 to 148. 120 from Calvi/Nottingham replace 25
Emily Appleton up 25 to 146. 135 from Wiesbaden/Nottingham
Olivia Nicholls up 3 to 70. ?
Alicia Barnett up 2 to 69. ?

Sorry if I've missed anyone.

Edit -- Given Added



-- Edited by Strongbow on Monday 8th of May 2023 03:36:32 PM


 Just out of interest , is there a reason why you use bold font for these updates? Not a problem, just wondered if it signified something ? Given that bold usually gets used to highlight something specific ? 



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:

Just as a highlight - no specific reason smile



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 32629
Date:

I see live rankings show Alicia at 67 and Olivia at 77 now, a 10 place difference - what happened to cause such a gap between them?

__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

Alicia played Hobart and Lyon at the beginning of the year with different partners when Olivia was injured. Those that keep track of doubles points may be able to provide a further explanation.

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 32629
Date:

Lambda wrote:

Alicia played Hobart and Lyon at the beginning of the year with different partners when Olivia was injured. Those that keep track of doubles points may be able to provide a further explanation.


 of course, I remember now, although I guess those points were already in her tally, and the rankings gap seems to have widened this week?



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:

Coric have them at 76 (-7) and 78 (-8) which seems more likely. Alicia and Olivia drop 90 points by the 22nd (next rankings - Rome).

The current live points on Coric are

78 935, 77 939, 76 955, 75 955, 74 960, 73 961, 72 965, 71 985  so it's pretty congested.

 



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 32629
Date:

Strongbow wrote:

Coric have them at 76 (-7) and 78 (-8) which seems more likely. Alicia and Olivia drop 90 points by the 22nd (next rankings - Rome).

The current live points on Coric are

78 935, 77 939, 76 955, 75 955, 74 960, 73 961, 72 965, 71 985  so it's pretty congested.

 


 Possibly live tennis have it wrong! 

https://live-tennis.eu/en/wta-doubles-live-ranking

They are showing a 1035 versus 954 gap, so 81 points, so maybe arent dropping Lissey's points and keeping her at 67 for some reason??



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:

JonH comes home wrote:
Strongbow wrote:

Coric have them at 76 (-7) and 78 (-8) which seems more likely. Alicia and Olivia drop 90 points by the 22nd (next rankings - Rome).

The current live points on Coric are

78 935, 77 939, 76 955, 75 955, 74 960, 73 961, 72 965, 71 985  so it's pretty congested.

 


 Possibly live tennis have it wrong! 

https://live-tennis.eu/en/wta-doubles-live-ranking

They are showing a 1035 versus 954 gap, so 81 points, so maybe arent dropping Lissey's points and keeping her at 67 for some reason??


 I agree with 1035 and 954 points so live-tennis.eu may be right. I'll wait for the 22nd.



__________________


Satellite level

Status: Offline
Posts: 1477
Date:

Both are dropping a 90 point counter. Because of the tournaments Alicia has played without Olivia, Alicia's next counter that replaces the dropped counter is higher than Olivia's. So Alicia has a 50 point counter replacing a 90 point counter (net - 40 points) and Olivia has it being replaced by a 10 point counter (net - 80 points).

Coric is applying singles rules and counting what are mandatory tournaments in singles (the Grand Slams).

__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Offline
Posts: 38876
Date:

Lambda wrote:

Both are dropping a 90 point counter. Because of the tournaments Alicia has played without Olivia, Alicia's next counter that replaces the dropped counter is higher than Olivia's. So Alicia has a 50 point counter replacing a 90 point counter (net - 40 points) and Olivia has it being replaced by a 10 point counter (net - 80 points).

Coric is applying singles rules and counting what are mandatory tournaments in singles (the Grand Slams).


Certainly to my mind too, live-tennis has Lissey and Olivia's figures correct and that is a good explanation.

I am not familiar with Coric but live-tennis seems rather more accurate than it was a few years ago. I've always liked its layout but for a time it did make some consistent annoying errors. Pretty but wrong doesn't really work. Better now.

The live rankings places gap is now more than one might have expected but is just one of these quirks about how players around them are distributed, that so many have slotted in between 1035 and 954 points. In the 08/05 official rankings there is just one place between them for a 41 points gap. Now as things stand Lissey is dropping a net 40 points and is up 2 places, Olivia is dropping a net 80 points and is down 7 places and there are 10 places between them for an 81 point gap.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:

22/05/2023

WTA

Halle Pringle in at 1528. 1 from Nottingham
Paulina Jurkowska up 5 to 1473. 1 from Nottingham
Kristina Paskauskas down 187 to 1132. 10 off from Monastir
Tiffany William up 5 to 1130. 1 from Serbia
Danielle Daley down 4 to 952. 1 off from Nottingham
Rebbeca Hill out. 1 off from Nottingham
Nadia Rawson out. 9 off from Nottingham
Given Roach up 403  to 931. 18 from Nottingham
Katie Swan up 2 to 886. 1 from Florence
Matilda Mutavdzic up 292 to 736. 22+9 from Spain
Ella McDonald up 81 to 650. 18 from Nottingham
Sonay Kartal down 11 to 611. 2 x 1 off from Nottingham
Abigail Amos up 77 to 577. 18 from Nottingham replace 1
Emma Wilson up 44 to 511. 18 from Nottingham replace 1
Eden Silva up 3 to 208. 18 from Sweden replace 9 off
Emily Webley-Smith down 48 to 236. 110 off replaced by 15
Heather Watson up 23 to 212. 29 from Florence replace 1
Maia Lumsden up 3 to 151 . 50 from Nottingham replace 15
Naiktha Bains at 148 . 50 from Nottingham replace 15
Harriet Dart up 6 to 109. 48 from Bodrum replace 1
Freya Christie up 2 to 118. 50 from Trnava replace 29
Ali Collins up 2 to 118. 50 from Trnava replace 29
Alicia Barnett down 3 to 72.
Olivia Nicholls down 5 to 75.



__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:

Selected GB players this year

wd0522diff.jpg



Attachments
__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:

29/05/2023

WTA

Tiffany William up 17  to 1113. 1 from Serbia
Madeleine Brooks down 3 to 748 . 1 from Monastir
Sarah Beth Grey up 21 to 262. 25 from Otocec
Emily Webley-Smith up 11 to 225. 42 from Otocec replace 15
Eden Silva up 5 to 203. 25 from Otocec replace 10
Emily Appleton up 8 to 137. 80 from Grado replace 30

No sign of Sarah Copley - possibly due to a R1 Bye at Loughborough confuse - She's got a ranking on ITF but not on WTA or Coric.



__________________


Tennis legend

Status: Online
Posts: 18847
Date:

Sarah is WR1353 on the WTA list with 10 points, but she is listed as Copley Sarah for some reason. There are are around 60 players on ten points though, so the actual ranking isn't really significant.

__________________


All-time great

Status: Offline
Posts: 6065
Date:

12/06/2023

WTA

Kristina Paskauskas down 262 to 1405. 10 off from Monastir
Andra Sutherland up 31 to 1177. 1 from Portugal
Tiffany William up 20 to 1093. 1 from La Marsa
Danielle Daley down 88 to 1054. 4 off from Monastir
Jessica Matthews down 24 to 1002. 1 off from Surbiton
Anna Popescu down 9 to 920. 1 off from Heraklion
Alisha Reayer up 42 to 770. 6 from Monastir replace 1
Holly Hutchinson up 131 to 719. 18 from Yecla
Katie Swan up 179 to 716. 25 from Surbiton
Madeleine Brooks up 98 to 650. 18 from Yecla
Matilda Mutavdzic up 134 to 613. 30 from Yecla
Ella McDonald up 85 to 574. 18 from Annenheim
Emilie Lindh down 38 to 527. 9 from Yecla replace 30 off
Emma Wilson up 42 to 474. 25 from Montemor-O-Novo replace 9
Jodie Burrage down 81 to 495. 50 off from Surbiton
Yuriko Lily Miyazaki down 22 to 435. 25 off from Surbiton
Heather Watson down 110 to 324, 130 off from RG
Sarah Beth Grey down 22 to 284. 25 off from Surbiton
Lauryn John-Baptiste up 53 to 276. 18/50 from La Marsa/Monastir replace 9/9
Emily Appleton up 9 to 128. 50 from Surbiton replace 30
Harriet Dart up 3 to 108. 25 off from Surbiton
Olivia Nicholls up 2 to 76. 85 from Surbiton replace 29.
Alicia Barnett down 1 to 74. 85 from Surbiton replace 50.



__________________
«First  <  127 28 29 30 31 32  >  Last»  | Page of 32  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard